Despite the positive-sounding headline, the NYT article was actually negative in tone, starting off with a joke about how an Android developer making $1-$2 per day on his app was laughed at by his peers, while insisting "that's pretty good money!"
The blows against Android then continue with a quote from Matt Hall, co-founder of Larva Labs, who talked about the problems with Google Checkout. Then Rovio's (maker of Angry Birds) Peter Vesterbacka complained about the challenges of developing for such a fragmented environment. And then it was Hall again, with a quote that's already getting repeated on Apple-watching blogs like John Gruber’s Daring Fireball:
"Google is not associated with things you pay for, and Android is an extension of that," said Mr. Hall of Larva Labs. "You don't pay for Google apps, so it bleeds into the expectations for the third-party apps, too."
There Are Ways to Get Paid
If you want to debate the merit of the above statements, feel free to head to the comments section, but we feel the need to point out the obvious miss from the NYT article: there are alternative revenue streams for developers besides direct app sales. (After all, even Google's "free" services aren't actually free - they're monetized through advertising.)
We recently highlighted some findings related to this matter earlier this month. For example, research from mobile ad company Millennial Media found that Android ad revenue has, for the first time ever, beaten iPhone ad revenue on the company's ad network.
At the time, we wondered why, given the lower ad impression numbers (as compared with iPhone/iOS). As it turns out, Millennial's Michael Avon had some thoughts on the matter. Besides the fact that there is simply less ad inventory amid soaring demand on Android, he also shared that Android is currently a "hot" platform for advertisers as it allows them to reach first-time smartphone buyers and a more diverse set of consumers.
"We believe some advertisers are paying a premium to reach those users early in their smartphone experience," he said. "Our advertisers have also shared that Android allows them to reach a diverse set of consumers across all major carriers, making the platform highly desirable and increasing demand for the platform...With more advertiser demand per each available impression on Android, it resulted in more revenue per impression."
The NYT article also makes brief mention of the lack of an in-app purchases model for Android, another disappointment for developers, especially since we recently learned that in-app purchases generate more revenue than ads, in some app categories.
However, as we also noted last week, developers don't have to wait on Google to implement an official in-app purchase mechanism, because there are several third-party solutions already available, including Boku and Zong for virtual goods and PayPal's in-app purchases technology for physical goods.
NYT had one good thing to say about Android development: because of the store sizes (100K vs 300K apps/Android vs iPhone) it's easier to get noticed in the Android Market today than it is in the iTunes App Store. Well, at least there's that.
A new documentary about Wall Street and the financial meltdown succeeds in making a dry topic into a visually stunning thriller. Randall Lane, author of The Zeroes, on the groundbreaking, bridge-burning film.
One subject featured in Inside Job, director Charles Ferguson's buzzy new Wall Street documentary, recently relayed a telling story to me over lunch: When Ferguson came to film in his apartment, he brought a crew of about fifteen. They filmed him for more than three hours. When they risked getting cut short by his apartment building's freight elevator hours, Ferguson stuck a stack of hundreds in the super's hand. And then when the movie, which rolls out nationwide today, was finally finished, said expert was featured for all of… eight seconds.
But those expensive—and perfect—eight seconds explain why Inside Job is the best movie about Wall Street since, well, Wall Street (the original, not the solidly mediocre Money Never Sleeps). And maybe the most important piece of work, in any medium, about the financial meltdown.
Ferguson spent as much as necessary to tell the story of crisis visually. He takes us on IMAX-worthy helicopter rides across the mossy hills of Iceland and the financial canyons of Manhattan (the cinematography was similar to Oliver Stone's skyline-obsessed visuals in the Wall Street sequel, as if the directors were dueling in adjacent editing rooms). Each of the three or so dozen interviews is composed and lit like a Vanity Fair portrait. Matt Damon provides the voice-over. (Ferguson estimates that Inside Job cost less than $2 million to produce—if true, someone should give this guy a studio to run.)
"It was surprisingly beautifully filmed," acid-tongued hedge-fund titan Bill Ackman said immediately after its premiere at the New York Film Festival this month. "Something you don't think of with a financial film."
The first words about the film that came to rock-star economist Nouriel Roubini's mind when I asked him were: "visually stunning."
More than making it pretty, this attention to aesthetics makes Inside Job effective. Most people still can't explain why the country's economy went into the toilet, other than that Wall Street's denizens are a bunch of greedy jackasses. Ferguson has coated the aspirin, his financial tutorial, with applesauce. Even the charts were gorgeous: the PowerPoint as art. Whether Ferguson consciously wanted to make something slick from something abstract, or merely holds his movies to high standards (his first documentary, about Iraq, was the Oscar-nominated No End in Sight), the result is the same: He's taken the headache-inducing story of the financial meltdown and made it accessible.
More than making it pretty, this attention to aesthetics makes Inside Job effective.
Sony Pictures Classics
I understand the power of slicking up the abstract world of high finance, and I also recently tried to explain the financial meltdown by telling a story. But I was limited both times by the constraints of still pictures and words. Inside Job, a movie intended to reveal the true power of Wall Street, accidentally uses Wall Street to reveal the true power of movies.
The key is Ferguson's ability to focus a narrative. Jumpy and wiry, he has a slight reputation as a tyrant—in introducing the film at the Film Festival to a fairly posh crowd, he pre-emptively apologized to his team for the tears he caused—but in watching the results, the control freak in him seems justified.
Compare Inside Job with Capitalism, Michael Moore's entertaining polemic on the broader sins of laissez-faire economics. Moore's was statement first, history second. Ferguson reverses those emphases—focusing solely on this historic meltdown, the who/what/where/why/how. And he does so accurately, with precision, the way a prosecutor lays out a case he's sure he's going to win. He filets the insiders who choose not to take the stand (Larry Summers, Hank Paulson) and those fools who did go on camera (Frederick Mishkin, Glenn Hubbard) get fully eviscerated.
JLS to appear on X Factor ahead of UK tour | Tixdaq.com Ticket <b>News</b>
JLS will perform on this week's X Factor results show along with Westlife and Take That.
Cee-Lo Sings 'Fox <b>News</b>' Version of 'F--- You' on 'Colbert' (VIDEO)
Cee-Lo Green was forced to revise his popular 'F**k You' single when he appeared on 'The Colbert Report' (weeknights, 11:30PM ET on COM). 'As this.
New Michael Jackson Track, 'Breaking <b>News</b>', In Quite Good Shocker <b>...</b>
Even Michael Jackson haters must be intrigued as to what the recently deceased pop-stars new single was going to sound like. There was a very good chance it wasn't going to be very good, what with MJ not being around long enough to ...
eric seiger
Despite the positive-sounding headline, the NYT article was actually negative in tone, starting off with a joke about how an Android developer making $1-$2 per day on his app was laughed at by his peers, while insisting "that's pretty good money!"
The blows against Android then continue with a quote from Matt Hall, co-founder of Larva Labs, who talked about the problems with Google Checkout. Then Rovio's (maker of Angry Birds) Peter Vesterbacka complained about the challenges of developing for such a fragmented environment. And then it was Hall again, with a quote that's already getting repeated on Apple-watching blogs like John Gruber’s Daring Fireball:
"Google is not associated with things you pay for, and Android is an extension of that," said Mr. Hall of Larva Labs. "You don't pay for Google apps, so it bleeds into the expectations for the third-party apps, too."
There Are Ways to Get Paid
If you want to debate the merit of the above statements, feel free to head to the comments section, but we feel the need to point out the obvious miss from the NYT article: there are alternative revenue streams for developers besides direct app sales. (After all, even Google's "free" services aren't actually free - they're monetized through advertising.)
We recently highlighted some findings related to this matter earlier this month. For example, research from mobile ad company Millennial Media found that Android ad revenue has, for the first time ever, beaten iPhone ad revenue on the company's ad network.
At the time, we wondered why, given the lower ad impression numbers (as compared with iPhone/iOS). As it turns out, Millennial's Michael Avon had some thoughts on the matter. Besides the fact that there is simply less ad inventory amid soaring demand on Android, he also shared that Android is currently a "hot" platform for advertisers as it allows them to reach first-time smartphone buyers and a more diverse set of consumers.
"We believe some advertisers are paying a premium to reach those users early in their smartphone experience," he said. "Our advertisers have also shared that Android allows them to reach a diverse set of consumers across all major carriers, making the platform highly desirable and increasing demand for the platform...With more advertiser demand per each available impression on Android, it resulted in more revenue per impression."
The NYT article also makes brief mention of the lack of an in-app purchases model for Android, another disappointment for developers, especially since we recently learned that in-app purchases generate more revenue than ads, in some app categories.
However, as we also noted last week, developers don't have to wait on Google to implement an official in-app purchase mechanism, because there are several third-party solutions already available, including Boku and Zong for virtual goods and PayPal's in-app purchases technology for physical goods.
NYT had one good thing to say about Android development: because of the store sizes (100K vs 300K apps/Android vs iPhone) it's easier to get noticed in the Android Market today than it is in the iTunes App Store. Well, at least there's that.
A new documentary about Wall Street and the financial meltdown succeeds in making a dry topic into a visually stunning thriller. Randall Lane, author of The Zeroes, on the groundbreaking, bridge-burning film.
One subject featured in Inside Job, director Charles Ferguson's buzzy new Wall Street documentary, recently relayed a telling story to me over lunch: When Ferguson came to film in his apartment, he brought a crew of about fifteen. They filmed him for more than three hours. When they risked getting cut short by his apartment building's freight elevator hours, Ferguson stuck a stack of hundreds in the super's hand. And then when the movie, which rolls out nationwide today, was finally finished, said expert was featured for all of… eight seconds.
But those expensive—and perfect—eight seconds explain why Inside Job is the best movie about Wall Street since, well, Wall Street (the original, not the solidly mediocre Money Never Sleeps). And maybe the most important piece of work, in any medium, about the financial meltdown.
Ferguson spent as much as necessary to tell the story of crisis visually. He takes us on IMAX-worthy helicopter rides across the mossy hills of Iceland and the financial canyons of Manhattan (the cinematography was similar to Oliver Stone's skyline-obsessed visuals in the Wall Street sequel, as if the directors were dueling in adjacent editing rooms). Each of the three or so dozen interviews is composed and lit like a Vanity Fair portrait. Matt Damon provides the voice-over. (Ferguson estimates that Inside Job cost less than $2 million to produce—if true, someone should give this guy a studio to run.)
"It was surprisingly beautifully filmed," acid-tongued hedge-fund titan Bill Ackman said immediately after its premiere at the New York Film Festival this month. "Something you don't think of with a financial film."
The first words about the film that came to rock-star economist Nouriel Roubini's mind when I asked him were: "visually stunning."
More than making it pretty, this attention to aesthetics makes Inside Job effective. Most people still can't explain why the country's economy went into the toilet, other than that Wall Street's denizens are a bunch of greedy jackasses. Ferguson has coated the aspirin, his financial tutorial, with applesauce. Even the charts were gorgeous: the PowerPoint as art. Whether Ferguson consciously wanted to make something slick from something abstract, or merely holds his movies to high standards (his first documentary, about Iraq, was the Oscar-nominated No End in Sight), the result is the same: He's taken the headache-inducing story of the financial meltdown and made it accessible.
More than making it pretty, this attention to aesthetics makes Inside Job effective.
Sony Pictures Classics
I understand the power of slicking up the abstract world of high finance, and I also recently tried to explain the financial meltdown by telling a story. But I was limited both times by the constraints of still pictures and words. Inside Job, a movie intended to reveal the true power of Wall Street, accidentally uses Wall Street to reveal the true power of movies.
The key is Ferguson's ability to focus a narrative. Jumpy and wiry, he has a slight reputation as a tyrant—in introducing the film at the Film Festival to a fairly posh crowd, he pre-emptively apologized to his team for the tears he caused—but in watching the results, the control freak in him seems justified.
Compare Inside Job with Capitalism, Michael Moore's entertaining polemic on the broader sins of laissez-faire economics. Moore's was statement first, history second. Ferguson reverses those emphases—focusing solely on this historic meltdown, the who/what/where/why/how. And he does so accurately, with precision, the way a prosecutor lays out a case he's sure he's going to win. He filets the insiders who choose not to take the stand (Larry Summers, Hank Paulson) and those fools who did go on camera (Frederick Mishkin, Glenn Hubbard) get fully eviscerated.
JLS to appear on X Factor ahead of UK tour | Tixdaq.com Ticket <b>News</b>
JLS will perform on this week's X Factor results show along with Westlife and Take That.
Cee-Lo Sings 'Fox <b>News</b>' Version of 'F--- You' on 'Colbert' (VIDEO)
Cee-Lo Green was forced to revise his popular 'F**k You' single when he appeared on 'The Colbert Report' (weeknights, 11:30PM ET on COM). 'As this.
New Michael Jackson Track, 'Breaking <b>News</b>', In Quite Good Shocker <b>...</b>
Even Michael Jackson haters must be intrigued as to what the recently deceased pop-stars new single was going to sound like. There was a very good chance it wasn't going to be very good, what with MJ not being around long enough to ...
eric seiger
eric seiger
eric seiger
JLS to appear on X Factor ahead of UK tour | Tixdaq.com Ticket <b>News</b>
JLS will perform on this week's X Factor results show along with Westlife and Take That.
Cee-Lo Sings 'Fox <b>News</b>' Version of 'F--- You' on 'Colbert' (VIDEO)
Cee-Lo Green was forced to revise his popular 'F**k You' single when he appeared on 'The Colbert Report' (weeknights, 11:30PM ET on COM). 'As this.
New Michael Jackson Track, 'Breaking <b>News</b>', In Quite Good Shocker <b>...</b>
Even Michael Jackson haters must be intrigued as to what the recently deceased pop-stars new single was going to sound like. There was a very good chance it wasn't going to be very good, what with MJ not being around long enough to ...
eric seiger
Despite the positive-sounding headline, the NYT article was actually negative in tone, starting off with a joke about how an Android developer making $1-$2 per day on his app was laughed at by his peers, while insisting "that's pretty good money!"
The blows against Android then continue with a quote from Matt Hall, co-founder of Larva Labs, who talked about the problems with Google Checkout. Then Rovio's (maker of Angry Birds) Peter Vesterbacka complained about the challenges of developing for such a fragmented environment. And then it was Hall again, with a quote that's already getting repeated on Apple-watching blogs like John Gruber’s Daring Fireball:
"Google is not associated with things you pay for, and Android is an extension of that," said Mr. Hall of Larva Labs. "You don't pay for Google apps, so it bleeds into the expectations for the third-party apps, too."
There Are Ways to Get Paid
If you want to debate the merit of the above statements, feel free to head to the comments section, but we feel the need to point out the obvious miss from the NYT article: there are alternative revenue streams for developers besides direct app sales. (After all, even Google's "free" services aren't actually free - they're monetized through advertising.)
We recently highlighted some findings related to this matter earlier this month. For example, research from mobile ad company Millennial Media found that Android ad revenue has, for the first time ever, beaten iPhone ad revenue on the company's ad network.
At the time, we wondered why, given the lower ad impression numbers (as compared with iPhone/iOS). As it turns out, Millennial's Michael Avon had some thoughts on the matter. Besides the fact that there is simply less ad inventory amid soaring demand on Android, he also shared that Android is currently a "hot" platform for advertisers as it allows them to reach first-time smartphone buyers and a more diverse set of consumers.
"We believe some advertisers are paying a premium to reach those users early in their smartphone experience," he said. "Our advertisers have also shared that Android allows them to reach a diverse set of consumers across all major carriers, making the platform highly desirable and increasing demand for the platform...With more advertiser demand per each available impression on Android, it resulted in more revenue per impression."
The NYT article also makes brief mention of the lack of an in-app purchases model for Android, another disappointment for developers, especially since we recently learned that in-app purchases generate more revenue than ads, in some app categories.
However, as we also noted last week, developers don't have to wait on Google to implement an official in-app purchase mechanism, because there are several third-party solutions already available, including Boku and Zong for virtual goods and PayPal's in-app purchases technology for physical goods.
NYT had one good thing to say about Android development: because of the store sizes (100K vs 300K apps/Android vs iPhone) it's easier to get noticed in the Android Market today than it is in the iTunes App Store. Well, at least there's that.
A new documentary about Wall Street and the financial meltdown succeeds in making a dry topic into a visually stunning thriller. Randall Lane, author of The Zeroes, on the groundbreaking, bridge-burning film.
One subject featured in Inside Job, director Charles Ferguson's buzzy new Wall Street documentary, recently relayed a telling story to me over lunch: When Ferguson came to film in his apartment, he brought a crew of about fifteen. They filmed him for more than three hours. When they risked getting cut short by his apartment building's freight elevator hours, Ferguson stuck a stack of hundreds in the super's hand. And then when the movie, which rolls out nationwide today, was finally finished, said expert was featured for all of… eight seconds.
But those expensive—and perfect—eight seconds explain why Inside Job is the best movie about Wall Street since, well, Wall Street (the original, not the solidly mediocre Money Never Sleeps). And maybe the most important piece of work, in any medium, about the financial meltdown.
Ferguson spent as much as necessary to tell the story of crisis visually. He takes us on IMAX-worthy helicopter rides across the mossy hills of Iceland and the financial canyons of Manhattan (the cinematography was similar to Oliver Stone's skyline-obsessed visuals in the Wall Street sequel, as if the directors were dueling in adjacent editing rooms). Each of the three or so dozen interviews is composed and lit like a Vanity Fair portrait. Matt Damon provides the voice-over. (Ferguson estimates that Inside Job cost less than $2 million to produce—if true, someone should give this guy a studio to run.)
"It was surprisingly beautifully filmed," acid-tongued hedge-fund titan Bill Ackman said immediately after its premiere at the New York Film Festival this month. "Something you don't think of with a financial film."
The first words about the film that came to rock-star economist Nouriel Roubini's mind when I asked him were: "visually stunning."
More than making it pretty, this attention to aesthetics makes Inside Job effective. Most people still can't explain why the country's economy went into the toilet, other than that Wall Street's denizens are a bunch of greedy jackasses. Ferguson has coated the aspirin, his financial tutorial, with applesauce. Even the charts were gorgeous: the PowerPoint as art. Whether Ferguson consciously wanted to make something slick from something abstract, or merely holds his movies to high standards (his first documentary, about Iraq, was the Oscar-nominated No End in Sight), the result is the same: He's taken the headache-inducing story of the financial meltdown and made it accessible.
More than making it pretty, this attention to aesthetics makes Inside Job effective.
Sony Pictures Classics
I understand the power of slicking up the abstract world of high finance, and I also recently tried to explain the financial meltdown by telling a story. But I was limited both times by the constraints of still pictures and words. Inside Job, a movie intended to reveal the true power of Wall Street, accidentally uses Wall Street to reveal the true power of movies.
The key is Ferguson's ability to focus a narrative. Jumpy and wiry, he has a slight reputation as a tyrant—in introducing the film at the Film Festival to a fairly posh crowd, he pre-emptively apologized to his team for the tears he caused—but in watching the results, the control freak in him seems justified.
Compare Inside Job with Capitalism, Michael Moore's entertaining polemic on the broader sins of laissez-faire economics. Moore's was statement first, history second. Ferguson reverses those emphases—focusing solely on this historic meltdown, the who/what/where/why/how. And he does so accurately, with precision, the way a prosecutor lays out a case he's sure he's going to win. He filets the insiders who choose not to take the stand (Larry Summers, Hank Paulson) and those fools who did go on camera (Frederick Mishkin, Glenn Hubbard) get fully eviscerated.
eric seiger
JLS to appear on X Factor ahead of UK tour | Tixdaq.com Ticket <b>News</b>
JLS will perform on this week's X Factor results show along with Westlife and Take That.
Cee-Lo Sings 'Fox <b>News</b>' Version of 'F--- You' on 'Colbert' (VIDEO)
Cee-Lo Green was forced to revise his popular 'F**k You' single when he appeared on 'The Colbert Report' (weeknights, 11:30PM ET on COM). 'As this.
New Michael Jackson Track, 'Breaking <b>News</b>', In Quite Good Shocker <b>...</b>
Even Michael Jackson haters must be intrigued as to what the recently deceased pop-stars new single was going to sound like. There was a very good chance it wasn't going to be very good, what with MJ not being around long enough to ...
eric seiger
eric seiger
JLS to appear on X Factor ahead of UK tour | Tixdaq.com Ticket <b>News</b>
JLS will perform on this week's X Factor results show along with Westlife and Take That.
Cee-Lo Sings 'Fox <b>News</b>' Version of 'F--- You' on 'Colbert' (VIDEO)
Cee-Lo Green was forced to revise his popular 'F**k You' single when he appeared on 'The Colbert Report' (weeknights, 11:30PM ET on COM). 'As this.
New Michael Jackson Track, 'Breaking <b>News</b>', In Quite Good Shocker <b>...</b>
Even Michael Jackson haters must be intrigued as to what the recently deceased pop-stars new single was going to sound like. There was a very good chance it wasn't going to be very good, what with MJ not being around long enough to ...
eric seiger
JLS to appear on X Factor ahead of UK tour | Tixdaq.com Ticket <b>News</b>
JLS will perform on this week's X Factor results show along with Westlife and Take That.
Cee-Lo Sings 'Fox <b>News</b>' Version of 'F--- You' on 'Colbert' (VIDEO)
Cee-Lo Green was forced to revise his popular 'F**k You' single when he appeared on 'The Colbert Report' (weeknights, 11:30PM ET on COM). 'As this.
New Michael Jackson Track, 'Breaking <b>News</b>', In Quite Good Shocker <b>...</b>
Even Michael Jackson haters must be intrigued as to what the recently deceased pop-stars new single was going to sound like. There was a very good chance it wasn't going to be very good, what with MJ not being around long enough to ...
eric seiger
JLS to appear on X Factor ahead of UK tour | Tixdaq.com Ticket <b>News</b>
JLS will perform on this week's X Factor results show along with Westlife and Take That.
Cee-Lo Sings 'Fox <b>News</b>' Version of 'F--- You' on 'Colbert' (VIDEO)
Cee-Lo Green was forced to revise his popular 'F**k You' single when he appeared on 'The Colbert Report' (weeknights, 11:30PM ET on COM). 'As this.
New Michael Jackson Track, 'Breaking <b>News</b>', In Quite Good Shocker <b>...</b>
Even Michael Jackson haters must be intrigued as to what the recently deceased pop-stars new single was going to sound like. There was a very good chance it wasn't going to be very good, what with MJ not being around long enough to ...
eric seiger eric seiger
eric seiger
eric seiger
eric seiger
JLS to appear on X Factor ahead of UK tour | Tixdaq.com Ticket <b>News</b>
JLS will perform on this week's X Factor results show along with Westlife and Take That.
Cee-Lo Sings 'Fox <b>News</b>' Version of 'F--- You' on 'Colbert' (VIDEO)
Cee-Lo Green was forced to revise his popular 'F**k You' single when he appeared on 'The Colbert Report' (weeknights, 11:30PM ET on COM). 'As this.
New Michael Jackson Track, 'Breaking <b>News</b>', In Quite Good Shocker <b>...</b>
Even Michael Jackson haters must be intrigued as to what the recently deceased pop-stars new single was going to sound like. There was a very good chance it wasn't going to be very good, what with MJ not being around long enough to ...
Making money from home is most if not all peoples dreams. Making money from home allows you to be more flexible and possibly to even follow you dreams. SO....how do you make money from home- below are a few tips and pointers to get you started.
1. DO YOUR RESEARCH - Decide what you want to do any why. There is no point in going into working from home blind, its better to do as much research as you can before you get started, and this way you will be able to establish what you want to do, why and where the markets lie, what they want and so on.
2. Research and find out about those schemes and scams that you don't want to wastes your time, energy or money on. So get up n them now before you waste or lose any money or time.
3. HAVE A PLAN - Working from home may sound all good and well but to be honest you need to have a plan in place, be it a business plan, a daily plan or a plan about where you want to go, regardless of what it is you need a plan to help guide you through what you want to do and why. Remember the old age saying that If you fail to plan then you plan for failure.
4. Get networking. Making money from home will be much easier if you can talk to people who have done it or are doing it now. So why not check out what online and offline networking opportunities there are out there that you could take advantage off.
5. BE PREPARED - I cannot stress this enough, BUT you must be totally prepared for nay and every hurdle that you come across. You will more than likely be competiting against other individuals, businesses and so on so you need to be prepared at each and every opportunity so you can seize it, take advantage of it and make money out of it.
6. Don't fall foul to the get rich quick group. When starting to working from home, or look for work from home then please remember not to fall foul of those pesky and annoying get rich quick schemes that promise you fame and fortune overnight for doing nothing. Please do not waste any of your time, energy or effort. Just remember that if it looks to good too be true it more than likely is.
I hope that you have found this article both helpful and useful. Good luck with making money from home and earning extra income from home. It is possible to make money from home with the right ideas and opportunities, just please do not expect to become an overnight millionaire without putting the work in.
eric seiger
JLS to appear on X Factor ahead of UK tour | Tixdaq.com Ticket <b>News</b>
JLS will perform on this week's X Factor results show along with Westlife and Take That.
Cee-Lo Sings 'Fox <b>News</b>' Version of 'F--- You' on 'Colbert' (VIDEO)
Cee-Lo Green was forced to revise his popular 'F**k You' single when he appeared on 'The Colbert Report' (weeknights, 11:30PM ET on COM). 'As this.
New Michael Jackson Track, 'Breaking <b>News</b>', In Quite Good Shocker <b>...</b>
Even Michael Jackson haters must be intrigued as to what the recently deceased pop-stars new single was going to sound like. There was a very good chance it wasn't going to be very good, what with MJ not being around long enough to ...
eric seiger
JLS to appear on X Factor ahead of UK tour | Tixdaq.com Ticket <b>News</b>
JLS will perform on this week's X Factor results show along with Westlife and Take That.
Cee-Lo Sings 'Fox <b>News</b>' Version of 'F--- You' on 'Colbert' (VIDEO)
Cee-Lo Green was forced to revise his popular 'F**k You' single when he appeared on 'The Colbert Report' (weeknights, 11:30PM ET on COM). 'As this.
New Michael Jackson Track, 'Breaking <b>News</b>', In Quite Good Shocker <b>...</b>
Even Michael Jackson haters must be intrigued as to what the recently deceased pop-stars new single was going to sound like. There was a very good chance it wasn't going to be very good, what with MJ not being around long enough to ...
eric seiger
No comments:
Post a Comment