Wednesday, September 29, 2010

Making Money Guide




It's not as easy as coming up with a good elevator pitch, putting together a compelling PowerPoint presentation, and then saying, "Show me the money." Venture capitalists most often require something in exchange for handing over much-needed cash. They want a percentage of your company. They often want at least one board seat. And they want an eventual exit strategy – an initial public offering (IPO), an acquisition, or some other event that promises a return on their investment.

Even if you're willing to give up all that control, venture capitalists are still quite picky about what companies they'll invest in. "One of the first hallmarks we look for is whether this is a high growth area or does this company have the potential for exceptional growth – growth that's higher than you see in the typical Fortune 1000 company," says Maha Ibrahim, a general partner in Canaan Partners, a venture capital firm with offices in the U.S., India, and Israel. "We want to invest in companies that will grow by leaps and bounds over the next five-to-ten years so that it justifies going to the public market or provides an exceptional exit that creates enterprise value."

The sections below will review what type of business is ripe for venture capital investment and how a business can get in the door and raise money from venture capitalists.


Dig Deeper: An Insider’s Guide to Venture Capital Financing


How to Raise Venture Capital: Businesses that VCs Will Back


Venture capitalists are in the business of making money for their investors – and to get a high rate of return they often have to take risks. While the rates of return to investors peaked in the late 1990s and have since fallen off, billions of dollars are still flowing into venture capital investments each quarter. During the first half of 2010, VC investments totaled $1.4 billion into 1,646 deals, according to the MoneyTree report from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the National Venture Capital Association, based on data provided by Thomson Reuters.

Technology and life sciences are the sectors that have recently been receiving the most VC investments. During the second quarter of 2010, investment in the clean technology industry – made up of companies that worked with alternative energy, pollution and recycling, power supplies and conservation – doubled over the first quarter to $1.5 billion. Meanwhile, investment in biotechnology and medical device companies combined rose by 50 percent to $2.1 billion.

"There are a number of areas we've identified as ripe for venture capital investment – digital media, enterprise software, semi-conductors, and some service plays," Ibrahim says. There are other sectors that VCs tend to avoid, including consulting or professional service-oriented companies, which are based more on people and human resources, and less on technology and scalable intellectual property, she adds.

Once a company is chosen for VC backing, it can make a world of difference in business prospects. "A successful financing can be one of the single most important milestones that propel your business toward its long-term goals," says Mike Dinsdale, vice president and CFO of DocuSign, an electronic signature service that has received several rounds of venture capital investment.


Dig Deeper: How States Can Attract Venture Capital


How to Raise Venture Capital: Getting In the Door


If you've decided that your business is in a sector that VCs tend to back and likely to experience exceptional growth, it's time to prepare your company, your management team, and your pitch for approaching VCs.

"As with any sales pitch, you need to carefully research the market before reaching out to potential investors," says Dinsdale. "As they say, you only get one chance to make a first impression."

Prepare very clear and succinct answers to the questions that all potential investors ask. In addition, develop a PowerPoint presentation 20-30 pages long that can help guide you through an hour or 90-minute presentation that answers the following questions:



  • What is your business plan? Detail your product, your market and why you have the competitive edge. "We're usually investing at such an early stage that there isn't a Forrester report on it or public analyst writing about the space," Ibrahim says. "Through our contacts at various companies, we recognize this is an area that has the potential to be big."



  • Why are you raising capital, and how will you invest it? Provide concrete numbers regarding how much investment you need and what you will be using that money for.



  • Who makes up your team, and why will they succeed where others may have failed? "Most venture capitalists say they invest in people and management teams, first and foremost," Ibrahim says. "Their investment is essentially a bet that your team will win in the marketplace."


Target Investors
Targeting the right investors can make or break your funding campaign; each firm has a different investment philosophy, Dinsdale says. Some invest at the early stage of a business, while others only participate in later rounds.

Do your homework. Research firms and the companies they have backed. Talk to everyone you know who has been through the process of raising venture capital. And then tap into both your own and the extended management team's networks to find personal connections with your targets.

"Being an entrepreneur means you're a good networker anyway," Ibrahim says. Once you find VCs to target, do some due diligence on them. Explore their websites to see the companies they have backed and speak with as many people you can find about their experiences with these investors – what they are like on boards, how they collaborate with management, what strategic value they bring to the firm.

"These are people who are going to be your partners hopefully through thick and thin over the lifetime of your company," Ibrahim says.

Initial Presentation
The first meeting you have with potential investors is a chemistry test, Dinsdale says. Tell them what type of investor the company is seeking.  "Don't go in desperately looking for money – one of the biggest mistakes a CEO can make is to deal from a position of weakness, appearing as though you need the money to stay afloat, rather than thoughtfully wanting funding from the right partner in order to grow your business," Dinsdale says.

Bring your product, if you have a prototype or a working model. One of the ways DocuSign was able to convince VCs to back the company was by using the electronic signature service throughout the funding process to facilitate electronic – rather than paper – signatures on various documents. "Not every company has such an obvious way of demonstrating its product during the funding process, but the same ingenuity that helped you form your start-up will likely be able to devise a similar demonstration," says Dinsdale.

The Due Diligence Process
After the presentation and the introductory meeting, the courtship begins as interested VCs begin to conduct due diligence. This step presents another opportunity to impress them with your preparation. Use this opportunity to compile a due diligence binder to present to potential investors, including your articles of incorporation, bylaws and operating agreements, and all documents furnished to shareholders and directors, any information about previous securities that have been issued, and all your financial information, from audited financial statements since inception to a summary of all bad debt.

Due diligence is not a one-way street. "Company leaders need to determine how each potential investor views its role with the company," Dinsdale says. "Don't be shy about asking for value-add from your investors. It should be a competition to earn the right to invest in your company.  At the end of the day, their value-added involvement only makes their investment more valuable."

Some companies perform due diligence on the product itself, hiring experts to examine the product or its market either from a technical standpoint or reviews from customers or potential customers.

Term Sheets
The next step in your courting ritual with venture capitalists comes if they are still interested. That's when they issue a "term sheet," in which they make their financing offer. "How the term-sheet stage is managed is key to getting the best deals possible," Dinsdale says. "Ideally, multiple investors will submit their term sheets around the same time. This benefits your company because competition means better company control; when there's only one investor interested, they control the negotiations."

The term sheet will spell out the following:








Can the Fed rescue the economy by making money even cheaper than it already is? A debate is being played out in the Fed about whether it should return to so-called "quantitative easing" -- buying more mortgage-backed securities, Treasury bills, and other bonds -- in order to lower the cost of capital still further.



The sad reality is that cheaper money won't work. Individuals aren't borrowing because they're still under a huge debt load. And as their homes drop in value and their jobs and wages continue to disappear, they're not in a position to borrow. Small businesses aren't borrowing because they have no reason to expand. Retail business is down, construction is down, even manufacturing suppliers are losing ground.



That leaves large corporations. They'll be happy to borrow more at even lower rates than now -- even though they're already sitting on mountains of money.



But this big-business borrowing won't create new jobs. To the contrary, large corporations have been investing their cash to pare back their payrolls. They've been buying new factories and facilities abroad (China, Brazil, India), and new labor-replacing software at home.



If Bernanke and company make it even cheaper to borrow, they'll be unleashing a third corporate strategy for creating more profits but fewer jobs -- mergers and acquisitions.



The M&A wave has already started. Continental and United Airlines just got approval to merge. Biotech giant Genzyme is on the auction block after Sanofi-Aventis announced a $18.5 billion bid. On Friday, 3Par, a data storage company, accepted a $1.8 billion takeover offer from Dell -- one day after Hewlett-Packard raised its offer. Campbell's Soup is eying parts of United Biscuits, BHP Billiton has put in a takeover bid for Potash, Oracle or H-P are likely to pay up to $1.5 billion for security software maker ArcSight. Bain Capital is expected to acquire Air Medical Group for almost $1 billion. The insurance industry is headed for the biggest merger boom in recent history.



Who wins from all this? If history is a guide, shareholders of acquired companies do better than shareholders of companies doing the acquiring. Top executives who end up running bigger corporations get fatter pay packages. And Wall Street and big-name corporate law firms who engineer the M&As reap a bundle.



Who loses? Large numbers of ordinary workers will lose their jobs. After all, the purpose M&As is to create greater economies of scale and more "synergies." Translated: More pink slips.



Last week in Jackson Hole, Ben Bernanke insisted the Fed will do what's necessary to increase consumer and business spending in order to keep the economy growing. But cheaper money won't necessarily create the kind of spending that generates more jobs. In fact, right now it's having the opposite effect. When consumers and small businesses can't and won't borrow more, big businesses use cheap money to bid up the prices of corporate assets and cut payrolls.



What we need now is more jobs, not bigger corporations.



This post originally appeared at RobertReich.org








EXCLUSIVE: Rachel Zoe and Brad Goreski Calling It Quits — Amicably <b>...</b>

Thomas Evans/PatrickMcMullan.com/Sipa "Bananas!" Celeb stylist Rachel Zoe and her bow-tie clad assistant Brad Goreski have sadly decided to go their separate ways, effective Oct. 1.

Obama Calls Fox <b>News</b> a `Destructive&#39; Channel - NYTimes.com

The president tells Rolling Stone that Fox News promotes a point of view that is "destructive" to the growth of the United States.

Small Business <b>News</b>: Social Media Survival Guide

Blogs, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn. These are only a few of the more common tools we think of when we hear the term social media. To grapple with this brand new.


benchcraft company scam
bench craft company rip off

5 Antique Ocarina s C6 G3 F4 5½ EWA Heinrich Fiehn yqz Sold on eBay by Million Dollar Power Seller Norb Novocin on estateauctionsinc by gettingsoldonebay


EXCLUSIVE: Rachel Zoe and Brad Goreski Calling It Quits — Amicably <b>...</b>

Thomas Evans/PatrickMcMullan.com/Sipa "Bananas!" Celeb stylist Rachel Zoe and her bow-tie clad assistant Brad Goreski have sadly decided to go their separate ways, effective Oct. 1.

Obama Calls Fox <b>News</b> a `Destructive&#39; Channel - NYTimes.com

The president tells Rolling Stone that Fox News promotes a point of view that is "destructive" to the growth of the United States.

Small Business <b>News</b>: Social Media Survival Guide

Blogs, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn. These are only a few of the more common tools we think of when we hear the term social media. To grapple with this brand new.


bench craft company rip off bench craft company rip off



It's not as easy as coming up with a good elevator pitch, putting together a compelling PowerPoint presentation, and then saying, "Show me the money." Venture capitalists most often require something in exchange for handing over much-needed cash. They want a percentage of your company. They often want at least one board seat. And they want an eventual exit strategy – an initial public offering (IPO), an acquisition, or some other event that promises a return on their investment.

Even if you're willing to give up all that control, venture capitalists are still quite picky about what companies they'll invest in. "One of the first hallmarks we look for is whether this is a high growth area or does this company have the potential for exceptional growth – growth that's higher than you see in the typical Fortune 1000 company," says Maha Ibrahim, a general partner in Canaan Partners, a venture capital firm with offices in the U.S., India, and Israel. "We want to invest in companies that will grow by leaps and bounds over the next five-to-ten years so that it justifies going to the public market or provides an exceptional exit that creates enterprise value."

The sections below will review what type of business is ripe for venture capital investment and how a business can get in the door and raise money from venture capitalists.


Dig Deeper: An Insider’s Guide to Venture Capital Financing


How to Raise Venture Capital: Businesses that VCs Will Back


Venture capitalists are in the business of making money for their investors – and to get a high rate of return they often have to take risks. While the rates of return to investors peaked in the late 1990s and have since fallen off, billions of dollars are still flowing into venture capital investments each quarter. During the first half of 2010, VC investments totaled $1.4 billion into 1,646 deals, according to the MoneyTree report from PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP and the National Venture Capital Association, based on data provided by Thomson Reuters.

Technology and life sciences are the sectors that have recently been receiving the most VC investments. During the second quarter of 2010, investment in the clean technology industry – made up of companies that worked with alternative energy, pollution and recycling, power supplies and conservation – doubled over the first quarter to $1.5 billion. Meanwhile, investment in biotechnology and medical device companies combined rose by 50 percent to $2.1 billion.

"There are a number of areas we've identified as ripe for venture capital investment – digital media, enterprise software, semi-conductors, and some service plays," Ibrahim says. There are other sectors that VCs tend to avoid, including consulting or professional service-oriented companies, which are based more on people and human resources, and less on technology and scalable intellectual property, she adds.

Once a company is chosen for VC backing, it can make a world of difference in business prospects. "A successful financing can be one of the single most important milestones that propel your business toward its long-term goals," says Mike Dinsdale, vice president and CFO of DocuSign, an electronic signature service that has received several rounds of venture capital investment.


Dig Deeper: How States Can Attract Venture Capital


How to Raise Venture Capital: Getting In the Door


If you've decided that your business is in a sector that VCs tend to back and likely to experience exceptional growth, it's time to prepare your company, your management team, and your pitch for approaching VCs.

"As with any sales pitch, you need to carefully research the market before reaching out to potential investors," says Dinsdale. "As they say, you only get one chance to make a first impression."

Prepare very clear and succinct answers to the questions that all potential investors ask. In addition, develop a PowerPoint presentation 20-30 pages long that can help guide you through an hour or 90-minute presentation that answers the following questions:



  • What is your business plan? Detail your product, your market and why you have the competitive edge. "We're usually investing at such an early stage that there isn't a Forrester report on it or public analyst writing about the space," Ibrahim says. "Through our contacts at various companies, we recognize this is an area that has the potential to be big."



  • Why are you raising capital, and how will you invest it? Provide concrete numbers regarding how much investment you need and what you will be using that money for.



  • Who makes up your team, and why will they succeed where others may have failed? "Most venture capitalists say they invest in people and management teams, first and foremost," Ibrahim says. "Their investment is essentially a bet that your team will win in the marketplace."


Target Investors
Targeting the right investors can make or break your funding campaign; each firm has a different investment philosophy, Dinsdale says. Some invest at the early stage of a business, while others only participate in later rounds.

Do your homework. Research firms and the companies they have backed. Talk to everyone you know who has been through the process of raising venture capital. And then tap into both your own and the extended management team's networks to find personal connections with your targets.

"Being an entrepreneur means you're a good networker anyway," Ibrahim says. Once you find VCs to target, do some due diligence on them. Explore their websites to see the companies they have backed and speak with as many people you can find about their experiences with these investors – what they are like on boards, how they collaborate with management, what strategic value they bring to the firm.

"These are people who are going to be your partners hopefully through thick and thin over the lifetime of your company," Ibrahim says.

Initial Presentation
The first meeting you have with potential investors is a chemistry test, Dinsdale says. Tell them what type of investor the company is seeking.  "Don't go in desperately looking for money – one of the biggest mistakes a CEO can make is to deal from a position of weakness, appearing as though you need the money to stay afloat, rather than thoughtfully wanting funding from the right partner in order to grow your business," Dinsdale says.

Bring your product, if you have a prototype or a working model. One of the ways DocuSign was able to convince VCs to back the company was by using the electronic signature service throughout the funding process to facilitate electronic – rather than paper – signatures on various documents. "Not every company has such an obvious way of demonstrating its product during the funding process, but the same ingenuity that helped you form your start-up will likely be able to devise a similar demonstration," says Dinsdale.

The Due Diligence Process
After the presentation and the introductory meeting, the courtship begins as interested VCs begin to conduct due diligence. This step presents another opportunity to impress them with your preparation. Use this opportunity to compile a due diligence binder to present to potential investors, including your articles of incorporation, bylaws and operating agreements, and all documents furnished to shareholders and directors, any information about previous securities that have been issued, and all your financial information, from audited financial statements since inception to a summary of all bad debt.

Due diligence is not a one-way street. "Company leaders need to determine how each potential investor views its role with the company," Dinsdale says. "Don't be shy about asking for value-add from your investors. It should be a competition to earn the right to invest in your company.  At the end of the day, their value-added involvement only makes their investment more valuable."

Some companies perform due diligence on the product itself, hiring experts to examine the product or its market either from a technical standpoint or reviews from customers or potential customers.

Term Sheets
The next step in your courting ritual with venture capitalists comes if they are still interested. That's when they issue a "term sheet," in which they make their financing offer. "How the term-sheet stage is managed is key to getting the best deals possible," Dinsdale says. "Ideally, multiple investors will submit their term sheets around the same time. This benefits your company because competition means better company control; when there's only one investor interested, they control the negotiations."

The term sheet will spell out the following:








Can the Fed rescue the economy by making money even cheaper than it already is? A debate is being played out in the Fed about whether it should return to so-called "quantitative easing" -- buying more mortgage-backed securities, Treasury bills, and other bonds -- in order to lower the cost of capital still further.



The sad reality is that cheaper money won't work. Individuals aren't borrowing because they're still under a huge debt load. And as their homes drop in value and their jobs and wages continue to disappear, they're not in a position to borrow. Small businesses aren't borrowing because they have no reason to expand. Retail business is down, construction is down, even manufacturing suppliers are losing ground.



That leaves large corporations. They'll be happy to borrow more at even lower rates than now -- even though they're already sitting on mountains of money.



But this big-business borrowing won't create new jobs. To the contrary, large corporations have been investing their cash to pare back their payrolls. They've been buying new factories and facilities abroad (China, Brazil, India), and new labor-replacing software at home.



If Bernanke and company make it even cheaper to borrow, they'll be unleashing a third corporate strategy for creating more profits but fewer jobs -- mergers and acquisitions.



The M&A wave has already started. Continental and United Airlines just got approval to merge. Biotech giant Genzyme is on the auction block after Sanofi-Aventis announced a $18.5 billion bid. On Friday, 3Par, a data storage company, accepted a $1.8 billion takeover offer from Dell -- one day after Hewlett-Packard raised its offer. Campbell's Soup is eying parts of United Biscuits, BHP Billiton has put in a takeover bid for Potash, Oracle or H-P are likely to pay up to $1.5 billion for security software maker ArcSight. Bain Capital is expected to acquire Air Medical Group for almost $1 billion. The insurance industry is headed for the biggest merger boom in recent history.



Who wins from all this? If history is a guide, shareholders of acquired companies do better than shareholders of companies doing the acquiring. Top executives who end up running bigger corporations get fatter pay packages. And Wall Street and big-name corporate law firms who engineer the M&As reap a bundle.



Who loses? Large numbers of ordinary workers will lose their jobs. After all, the purpose M&As is to create greater economies of scale and more "synergies." Translated: More pink slips.



Last week in Jackson Hole, Ben Bernanke insisted the Fed will do what's necessary to increase consumer and business spending in order to keep the economy growing. But cheaper money won't necessarily create the kind of spending that generates more jobs. In fact, right now it's having the opposite effect. When consumers and small businesses can't and won't borrow more, big businesses use cheap money to bid up the prices of corporate assets and cut payrolls.



What we need now is more jobs, not bigger corporations.



This post originally appeared at RobertReich.org








benchcraft company scam

EXCLUSIVE: Rachel Zoe and Brad Goreski Calling It Quits — Amicably <b>...</b>

Thomas Evans/PatrickMcMullan.com/Sipa "Bananas!" Celeb stylist Rachel Zoe and her bow-tie clad assistant Brad Goreski have sadly decided to go their separate ways, effective Oct. 1.

Obama Calls Fox <b>News</b> a `Destructive&#39; Channel - NYTimes.com

The president tells Rolling Stone that Fox News promotes a point of view that is "destructive" to the growth of the United States.

Small Business <b>News</b>: Social Media Survival Guide

Blogs, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn. These are only a few of the more common tools we think of when we hear the term social media. To grapple with this brand new.


benchcraft company scam bench craft company rip off

EXCLUSIVE: Rachel Zoe and Brad Goreski Calling It Quits — Amicably <b>...</b>

Thomas Evans/PatrickMcMullan.com/Sipa "Bananas!" Celeb stylist Rachel Zoe and her bow-tie clad assistant Brad Goreski have sadly decided to go their separate ways, effective Oct. 1.

Obama Calls Fox <b>News</b> a `Destructive&#39; Channel - NYTimes.com

The president tells Rolling Stone that Fox News promotes a point of view that is "destructive" to the growth of the United States.

Small Business <b>News</b>: Social Media Survival Guide

Blogs, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn. These are only a few of the more common tools we think of when we hear the term social media. To grapple with this brand new.


bench craft company rip off benchcraft company scam

EXCLUSIVE: Rachel Zoe and Brad Goreski Calling It Quits — Amicably <b>...</b>

Thomas Evans/PatrickMcMullan.com/Sipa "Bananas!" Celeb stylist Rachel Zoe and her bow-tie clad assistant Brad Goreski have sadly decided to go their separate ways, effective Oct. 1.

Obama Calls Fox <b>News</b> a `Destructive&#39; Channel - NYTimes.com

The president tells Rolling Stone that Fox News promotes a point of view that is "destructive" to the growth of the United States.

Small Business <b>News</b>: Social Media Survival Guide

Blogs, Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn. These are only a few of the more common tools we think of when we hear the term social media. To grapple with this brand new.


bench craft company rip off












































Tuesday, September 28, 2010

manage personal finances

Having a hard time managing credit card debt problems? Try using Creditable, a web app that can help you tackle your debt head-on by tracking your progress, generating suggested achievable goals based on your situation, and by allowing you to interact with other people that can help you.

The best part about Creditable is that it is free and anonymous, thus it can still generate your personalized goals even without submitting a credit report.

Creditable requires users to sign up before being able to use it, but the registration only requires an email address so you don’t have to divulge your identity. You do not have to be worried about security issues when using the site since you won’t have to reveal any personal information.

Creditable will also produce goals that are particular for your situation which can serve as your guide that can help you out of your current credit issues.

Creditable also fosters an online community where people can ask about credit related issues and receive advice from other people, who may have gone through your current situation. In addition, you can easily find other users that have the same goals as yours, for more social support.

Features:

  • Manage your credits without revealing your identity.
  • Track the progress of your credit, works with multiple accounts.
  • Suggests achievable goals based on your particular situation.
  • Connects you with other people that have similar credit issues.
  • Provides personalized credit card suggestions when re-establishing credit.
  • Similar Tools: Mint, Paystr, Accpal, TripLittle.

Check out Creditable @ http://getcreditable.com


From Hotline (HT: Mataconis):


O'Donnell, a perennial conservative candidate in Delaware, is challenging moderate Rep. Mike Castle (R), the clear favorite of the GOP establishment. But she has come under fire recently for her personal financial problems. Reports have surfaced that she owed $10K in back taxes, defaulted on her mortgage and holds outstanding campaign debt.


Levi Russell, a spokesman for the group, told Hotline On Call that the group was not aware of O'Donnell's personal financial problems before it endorsed her.


"We don't know the exact situation," he said.


When asked if the group discussed the issues with O'Donnell, Russell responded: "No we haven't. We don't really have any contact with the campaign or the candidate."


We have blogged before reasons why we support Mike Castle over O'Donnell. But this report raises even more questions, such as:



  1. If the Tea Party really stands for fiscal conservatism, why would they endorse somebody who can't even manage her personal finances?

  2. Does it give you confidence in the Tea Party that they go around endorsing people without having any contact with the candidate? How do they know that this female version of Harold Stassen is really worthy of such an endorsement?

  3. Christine O'Donnell has run for office 4 times. Her sole victory was an uncontested Republican primary.

  4. In 2008, O'Donnell lost the Delaware senate race to Joe Biden by 65-35. She later falsely claimed to have won two counties in that race. Biden's percentage of the vote in 2008 was the largest of any of his senatorial campaigns.

  5. In 2008, one of the great Democratic landslides, Mike Castle beat his Democratic challenger for Delaware's sole Congressional seat by 23 points. Castle has won 13 consecutive state-wide races as a candidate either for Governor or Congressman. He's way ahead of the Democrat in the polls while O'Donnell trails the Democrat by 10 points.


As a student of Delaware corporate governance, I am firmly convinced that Delaware needs quality representation in Congress if it is to fend off the creeping federalization of corporate law. As a big tent Republican, I'm inclined to support smart, electable, centrists like Mike Castle over someone like O'Donnell. The perfect must not be allowed to become the enemy of the good. Especially when the supposed perfect candidate is pretty seriously flawed and probably unelectable.


Weekly Search &amp; Social <b>News</b>: 09/28/2010 | Search Engine Journal

Hey there gang, it's time for another '7 Days of Search and Social' . Did ya miss me? Sure ye did. I was ill last week so for the first time, in a long time,

Obama Says Fox <b>News</b> Is Hurting The Growth Of The United States

President targets Murdoch, hedge fund executives, and whiny Democrats in Rolling Stone interview.

Mobile Ads <b>News</b> and Trends: Android Requests Up, iAd on the Rise <b>...</b>

When it rains, it pours! Today, there's a ton of new information about mobile advertising trends and new initiatives, all of which should catch the eye of marketers, ...

halloween costumes

Weekly Search &amp; Social <b>News</b>: 09/28/2010 | Search Engine Journal

Hey there gang, it's time for another '7 Days of Search and Social' . Did ya miss me? Sure ye did. I was ill last week so for the first time, in a long time,

Obama Says Fox <b>News</b> Is Hurting The Growth Of The United States

President targets Murdoch, hedge fund executives, and whiny Democrats in Rolling Stone interview.

Mobile Ads <b>News</b> and Trends: Android Requests Up, iAd on the Rise <b>...</b>

When it rains, it pours! Today, there's a ton of new information about mobile advertising trends and new initiatives, all of which should catch the eye of marketers, ...

Having a hard time managing credit card debt problems? Try using Creditable, a web app that can help you tackle your debt head-on by tracking your progress, generating suggested achievable goals based on your situation, and by allowing you to interact with other people that can help you.

The best part about Creditable is that it is free and anonymous, thus it can still generate your personalized goals even without submitting a credit report.

Creditable requires users to sign up before being able to use it, but the registration only requires an email address so you don’t have to divulge your identity. You do not have to be worried about security issues when using the site since you won’t have to reveal any personal information.

Creditable will also produce goals that are particular for your situation which can serve as your guide that can help you out of your current credit issues.

Creditable also fosters an online community where people can ask about credit related issues and receive advice from other people, who may have gone through your current situation. In addition, you can easily find other users that have the same goals as yours, for more social support.

Features:

  • Manage your credits without revealing your identity.
  • Track the progress of your credit, works with multiple accounts.
  • Suggests achievable goals based on your particular situation.
  • Connects you with other people that have similar credit issues.
  • Provides personalized credit card suggestions when re-establishing credit.
  • Similar Tools: Mint, Paystr, Accpal, TripLittle.

Check out Creditable @ http://getcreditable.com


From Hotline (HT: Mataconis):


O'Donnell, a perennial conservative candidate in Delaware, is challenging moderate Rep. Mike Castle (R), the clear favorite of the GOP establishment. But she has come under fire recently for her personal financial problems. Reports have surfaced that she owed $10K in back taxes, defaulted on her mortgage and holds outstanding campaign debt.


Levi Russell, a spokesman for the group, told Hotline On Call that the group was not aware of O'Donnell's personal financial problems before it endorsed her.


"We don't know the exact situation," he said.


When asked if the group discussed the issues with O'Donnell, Russell responded: "No we haven't. We don't really have any contact with the campaign or the candidate."


We have blogged before reasons why we support Mike Castle over O'Donnell. But this report raises even more questions, such as:



  1. If the Tea Party really stands for fiscal conservatism, why would they endorse somebody who can't even manage her personal finances?

  2. Does it give you confidence in the Tea Party that they go around endorsing people without having any contact with the candidate? How do they know that this female version of Harold Stassen is really worthy of such an endorsement?

  3. Christine O'Donnell has run for office 4 times. Her sole victory was an uncontested Republican primary.

  4. In 2008, O'Donnell lost the Delaware senate race to Joe Biden by 65-35. She later falsely claimed to have won two counties in that race. Biden's percentage of the vote in 2008 was the largest of any of his senatorial campaigns.

  5. In 2008, one of the great Democratic landslides, Mike Castle beat his Democratic challenger for Delaware's sole Congressional seat by 23 points. Castle has won 13 consecutive state-wide races as a candidate either for Governor or Congressman. He's way ahead of the Democrat in the polls while O'Donnell trails the Democrat by 10 points.


As a student of Delaware corporate governance, I am firmly convinced that Delaware needs quality representation in Congress if it is to fend off the creeping federalization of corporate law. As a big tent Republican, I'm inclined to support smart, electable, centrists like Mike Castle over someone like O'Donnell. The perfect must not be allowed to become the enemy of the good. Especially when the supposed perfect candidate is pretty seriously flawed and probably unelectable.



Greetings FROM OUR HOME TO YOURS by Magda'70

corporate reputation management company

Weekly Search &amp; Social <b>News</b>: 09/28/2010 | Search Engine Journal

Hey there gang, it's time for another '7 Days of Search and Social' . Did ya miss me? Sure ye did. I was ill last week so for the first time, in a long time,

Obama Says Fox <b>News</b> Is Hurting The Growth Of The United States

President targets Murdoch, hedge fund executives, and whiny Democrats in Rolling Stone interview.

Mobile Ads <b>News</b> and Trends: Android Requests Up, iAd on the Rise <b>...</b>

When it rains, it pours! Today, there's a ton of new information about mobile advertising trends and new initiatives, all of which should catch the eye of marketers, ...

skin and vein center

Weekly Search &amp; Social <b>News</b>: 09/28/2010 | Search Engine Journal

Hey there gang, it's time for another '7 Days of Search and Social' . Did ya miss me? Sure ye did. I was ill last week so for the first time, in a long time,

Obama Says Fox <b>News</b> Is Hurting The Growth Of The United States

President targets Murdoch, hedge fund executives, and whiny Democrats in Rolling Stone interview.

Mobile Ads <b>News</b> and Trends: Android Requests Up, iAd on the Rise <b>...</b>

When it rains, it pours! Today, there's a ton of new information about mobile advertising trends and new initiatives, all of which should catch the eye of marketers, ...


Greetings FROM OUR HOME TO YOURS by Magda'70

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_18/b4032066.htm

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_18/b4032066.htm

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_18/b4032066.htm

http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1999/10/25/267811/index.htm

http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1999/10/25/267811/index.htm

http://money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/fortune_archive/1999/10/25/267811/index.htm

http://www.businessweek.com/magazine/content/07_18/b4032066.htm

Friday, September 24, 2010

managing personal finances




  • CEDIA: LG, JVC and Sony debut LCoS-based 3D front projectors



  • BMW ActiveE electric car - Consumer field trials to begin next summer



  • Five insider shopping tips for Gordon Gekko



  • Daily Dispatch: Google NEW lists updates of all its products; Survey reveals people prefer colonoscopies to computer maintenance



  • 2010 Distracted Driving Summit: What’s next for combating driver distractions?



  • What's the deal with car tire pricing?



  • Q&A: Short on salt



  • Daily electronics deals



  • 6 painless ways to cut your grocery bill



  • Go green for school supplies







  • CEDIA: LG, JVC and Sony debut LCoS-based 3D front projectors



  • BMW ActiveE electric car - Consumer field trials to begin next summer



  • Five insider shopping tips for Gordon Gekko



  • Daily Dispatch: Google NEW lists updates of all its products; Survey reveals people prefer colonoscopies to computer maintenance



  • 2010 Distracted Driving Summit: What’s next for combating driver distractions?



  • What's the deal with car tire pricing?



  • Q&A: Short on salt



  • Daily electronics deals



  • 6 painless ways to cut your grocery bill



  • Go green for school supplies






big white booty alabama

Bad <b>news</b> for green technology | Watts Up With That?

Super magnet production has also been shipped over to China http://www.chinamagnet.in/i-News-229212/The-development-and-applications-of-Rare-Earth-Permanent-Magnetic-Materials-244616.html. Over the last 10 to 20 years companies have ...

Early Critics Weigh in on Benu : Good <b>News</b>/Bad <b>News</b> : Eater SF

After slaving away in the internationally acclaimed French Laundry kitchen with one Thomas Kellar for years, Corey Lee is on his own now at Benu. If you've never heard of...

<b>News</b> - Lindsay Lohan Going Back to Jail Until Oct. 22 - Celebrity <b>...</b>

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Elden S. Fox revokes her probation for failing at least one drug test.


Bad <b>news</b> for green technology | Watts Up With That?

Super magnet production has also been shipped over to China http://www.chinamagnet.in/i-News-229212/The-development-and-applications-of-Rare-Earth-Permanent-Magnetic-Materials-244616.html. Over the last 10 to 20 years companies have ...

Early Critics Weigh in on Benu : Good <b>News</b>/Bad <b>News</b> : Eater SF

After slaving away in the internationally acclaimed French Laundry kitchen with one Thomas Kellar for years, Corey Lee is on his own now at Benu. If you've never heard of...

<b>News</b> - Lindsay Lohan Going Back to Jail Until Oct. 22 - Celebrity <b>...</b>

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Elden S. Fox revokes her probation for failing at least one drug test.


big white booty

Bad <b>news</b> for green technology | Watts Up With That?

Super magnet production has also been shipped over to China http://www.chinamagnet.in/i-News-229212/The-development-and-applications-of-Rare-Earth-Permanent-Magnetic-Materials-244616.html. Over the last 10 to 20 years companies have ...

Early Critics Weigh in on Benu : Good <b>News</b>/Bad <b>News</b> : Eater SF

After slaving away in the internationally acclaimed French Laundry kitchen with one Thomas Kellar for years, Corey Lee is on his own now at Benu. If you've never heard of...

<b>News</b> - Lindsay Lohan Going Back to Jail Until Oct. 22 - Celebrity <b>...</b>

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Elden S. Fox revokes her probation for failing at least one drug test.



MABUHAY ALLIANCE HOST THE 6TH ANNUAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE by mabuhayalliance







MABUHAY ALLIANCE HOST THE 6TH ANNUAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CONFERENCE by mabuhayalliance






























personal financeonline personal finance



network big white booty

<b>News</b> - Lindsay Lohan Going Back to Jail Until Oct. 22 - Celebrity <b>...</b>

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Elden S. Fox revokes her probation for failing at least one drug test.

Apple&#39;s MobileMe <b>News</b> details how iWork for iPad works with iDisk

The details were posted on MobileMe News, the blog of the MobileMe team. Windows users can point a browser to me.com/idisk and upload existing Microsoft Office documents. Once the documents are in the cloud, they can be opened from the ...

Libratone Beat offers wireless playback from iPad, iPhone, iPod <b>...</b>

iLounge news discussing the Libratone Beat offers wireless playback from iPad, iPhone, iPod. Find more iPod Accessories news from leading independent iPod, iPhone, and iPad site.


<b>News</b> - Lindsay Lohan Going Back to Jail Until Oct. 22 - Celebrity <b>...</b>

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Elden S. Fox revokes her probation for failing at least one drug test.

Apple&#39;s MobileMe <b>News</b> details how iWork for iPad works with iDisk

The details were posted on MobileMe News, the blog of the MobileMe team. Windows users can point a browser to me.com/idisk and upload existing Microsoft Office documents. Once the documents are in the cloud, they can be opened from the ...

Libratone Beat offers wireless playback from iPad, iPhone, iPod <b>...</b>

iLounge news discussing the Libratone Beat offers wireless playback from iPad, iPhone, iPod. Find more iPod Accessories news from leading independent iPod, iPhone, and iPad site.


big white booty

<b>News</b> - Lindsay Lohan Going Back to Jail Until Oct. 22 - Celebrity <b>...</b>

Los Angeles Superior Court Judge Elden S. Fox revokes her probation for failing at least one drug test.

Apple&#39;s MobileMe <b>News</b> details how iWork for iPad works with iDisk

The details were posted on MobileMe News, the blog of the MobileMe team. Windows users can point a browser to me.com/idisk and upload existing Microsoft Office documents. Once the documents are in the cloud, they can be opened from the ...

Libratone Beat offers wireless playback from iPad, iPhone, iPod <b>...</b>

iLounge news discussing the Libratone Beat offers wireless playback from iPad, iPhone, iPod. Find more iPod Accessories news from leading independent iPod, iPhone, and iPad site.




































Thursday, September 23, 2010

Making Money on Line


"Flounder: You _______ up -- you trusted us."

-Otter in the movie Animal House.



Let's face it, we screwed up.



In the decade before 2008, the financial world was like a presidential inauguration ball.



On Inauguration day, there is a ball where only the closest insiders and Washington power players get invited.



There are also a lot of parties around town, so just about everybody in Washington feels like they were part of the event.



For a decade, Wall Street was playing funny money games. They were allowed to grant themselves multimillion dollar bonuses, and many Americans also felt like they were invited to the celebration.



Real estate prices were soaring. People were flipping houses and condos. People with lousy credit and no income were living in nice houses. Almost anyone could get a loan for anything.



Stock prices were going up and pension plans were getting fatter. State and local governments had a lot of money to throw around and could cut taxes without anyone really noticing.



We had easy money and reaped many benefits without hard work or sacrifice.



We were living in fantasy land.



The fantasy is over. We woke up to a nightmare.



A nightmare that our nation has not yet dealt with.



People with addictions go through a process called "bottoming out." They reach a point where they realize their actions are hurting themselves or others. They get help and dramatically change their lives.



Because of the Wall Street bailouts, America never got the chance to "bottom out."



Like a drunk who keeps "having a drink or two," America has not really dealt with the problems that got us in the mess.



Like an addict who keeps using, we are setting ourselves up for repeat failure.



I've been reading Maria Bartiromo's new book, The Weekend That Changed Wall Street. A better title might have been "The Weekend that Changed the World."



It was America's chance to bottom out. We didn't. To paraphrase Otter in Animal House, we screwed up. We mortgaged the future to make Wall Street happy today.



I liked Bartiromo's book. One of her insights jumped out at me.



In talking about the fall from grace that some Wall Street insiders felt, she noted "When the wealthy falter, there is a deep shame that the average person cannot grasp. In that world, you are either in or you're out."



That line explains everything. Wall Street was in. They had the right lobbyists and had an alumni association from Goldman Sachs, including Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson, doing their bidding in Washington.



Those who came from Wall Street looked out for their own. They made sure their Wall Street cronies were paid back, 100 cents on the dollar.



The rest of us were out. And we have stayed there.



Unemployment remains around 10% and underemployment is even more chronic. Sales of existing homes are at a 15-year low, despite some of the lowest mortgage rates in history. It's almost impossible for a Main Street business to get financing, and state and local government entities are looking at severe cuts in revenues and services.



We've spent trillions in bailout money and all we got was "one day older and deeper in debt."



Although it sounds gloomy, I'm not a gloomy person by nature. With focus, hard work and resilience, people can overcome any obstacle.



Including what Wall Street and Washington did to us.



People can solve problems by taking a hard look at themselves and making changes.



Washington is afraid to take that hard look or make real changes. Our political "leaders" won't do anything that cuts off the campaign contributions and lobbying money that Wall Street provides.



My next column will give a concrete plan for creating wealth without Wall Street. You can see signs of it. Concepts like Move Your Money are catching on. People are starting to pay down debt and look at creating their own businesses.



We weren't really invited to the big Wall Street party. But we sure wound up paying for it.



Now it is time to recover from the hangover.







Don McNay, CLU, ChFC, MSFS, CSSC of Richmond Kentucky is an award-winning financial columnist and Huffington Post Contributor.



You can read more about Don at www.donmcnay.com



McNay founded McNay Settlement Group, a structured settlement and consulting firm, in 1983, and Kentucky Guardianship Administrators LLC in 2000. You can read more about both at www.mcnay.com



McNay has Master's Degrees from Vanderbilt and the American College and is in the Hall of Distinguished Alumni of Eastern Kentucky University.



McNay has written two books. Most recent is Son of a Son of a Gambler: Winners, Losers and What to Do When You Win The Lottery



McNay is a lifetime member of the Million Dollar Round Table and has four professional designations in the financial services field.




















15 Responses to “Mo’ Money, Mo’ Demand”






  1. SON says:



    September 9th, 2010 at 4:04 pm

    DAD I AM HOMOSEX.








  2. DAD says:



    September 9th, 2010 at 4:04 pm

    SON I AM DISAPPOINT.








  3. Rob Mac says:



    September 9th, 2010 at 4:53 pm

    Or we could simply “print” money to retire some of our debt. This would reassure people who get freaked out at the size of the debt and would have the same inflationary effect of handing the money out to American citizens. The stimulative effect would likely be a bit less, but I’d take that tradeoff.








  4. JR says:



    September 9th, 2010 at 4:54 pm

    Aren’t you missing the role of international trade. What you say makes sense if all goods and services are produced locally. Once you take intl. trade into account, more/printed money could simply go into buying more from other countries, who could theoretically hold that money for an indefinite time.








  5. chris says:



    September 9th, 2010 at 4:56 pm

    It’s true that at some point the money-printing would spark high inflation.


    Yes — specifically, after aggregate demand was boosted to the point that it exceeded aggregate supply. We’re nowhere near that point — I think literally trillions of dollars short of it — so there’s plenty of room to play around with helicopter drops. Please do, Mr. Bernanke.








  6. timmie says:



    September 9th, 2010 at 4:59 pm

    Did that truly huge spike in Fed spending 2008-2009 lead to rapid economic growth? No. What evidence is there that things would be any different now? None.

    The Great Reckoning that we are now experiencing was, as your cite points out, only postponed through half a decade of public and private debt increasing by 10% a year and when that became unsustainable our financial system cratered.

    Does anyone think we can return to those levels of profligacy for five years or more? Does anyone doubt that even that level of new debt would prove inadequate to cure what ails us?

    Our recent history has been one huge Keynesian experiment gone wrong. But to put out the fire in the dining room Matt wants to burn down the house.








  7. chris says:



    September 9th, 2010 at 5:29 pm

    Did that truly huge spike in Fed spending 2008-2009 lead to rapid economic growth? No.


    No, it only halted a once-in-a-century level of economic collapse in its tracks.


    But I guess since the first gallon of water didn’t put the fire out, it’s time to abandon that plan and switch to gasoline.








  8. Ape Man says:



    September 9th, 2010 at 8:32 pm

    “Or we could simply “print” money to retire some of our debt.”


    This is incorrect. If you think it through, it will help you understand how money works on the macro scale.


    A treasury note is an account at the Fed that bears interest. It has a fixed, often very short, term of maturity.


    If you “print money” to “retire” that debt, all you are doing is changing those interest-bearing Fed accounts into non interest-bearing Fed accounts. The people who held those dollars want to hold them as Treasury notes. They will immediately reinvest them in… Treasury notes.


    3








  9. zyxw says:



    September 9th, 2010 at 8:50 pm

    Another structural problem now is income inequality. If income was spread out more fairly there would be a lot more money spent generating more jobs, etc. There’s only so much the super rich can spend–after awhile you really can’t buy that much more stuff, so instead they are hoarding it at the moment waiting for the economy to rebound so they can eventually invest in something and make even more money to hoard.








  10. Shooter242 says:



    September 9th, 2010 at 10:33 pm

    * You can print all the money you want but if people don’t want to borrow, it doesn’t matter.

    * As for throwing everybody a grand, it didn’t work with Bush’s $600 because you and everyone else knows it’s a one-off.

    * Then there is the payroll credit for about the same amount of money, how did that work out?


    Do you think our problem could be related to Congress serving up legislative pigs in a poke? For all it’s wonderfulness, health insurance in Massachusetts has led to Mass Gen Hospital

    to barring new primary care patients. Now imagine that over an entire country. Any chance that would lead to more saving and less spending?


    As for income inequality, Al Gore making millions has no effect on anyone that he doesn’t employ. Interestingly, the US is pretty far down on the property rights ladder globally. Apparently we are behind China, Gambia, and Jordan. Having yahoos here threaten to confiscate wealth by hook or crook, isn’t reassuring.








  11. BB says:



    September 9th, 2010 at 11:23 pm

    So, why do we even keep track of the deficit? I accept the fact that we have a sovereign currency, not on a gold standard, etc., which means that we don’t have to go in debt (i.e. sell bonds) for every dollar we print/create. Thus taxation is merely an anti-inflationary measure. So…shouldn’t we just keep track of inflation and adjust our federal spending accordingly, since the deficit doesn’t actually mean anything?








  12. urgs says:



    September 10th, 2010 at 2:23 am

    Defraud small savers (thats allright, since so many of them are foreigners nowadays – evil Chinese, many of them living from less than 1$ a day), shovel some windfall gains to big business ===> ?????????? =====> Jobs!


    aelkejeellekeleljklejlelje








  13. Evil Twin says:



    September 10th, 2010 at 2:35 am

    You can print all the money you want but if people don’t want to borrow, it doesn’t matter.


    And here we see the return of the invisible bear riding phantom bond vigilantes. Yes, the modifiers are a bit unclear. That’s because Shooter is a fucking moron whose knowledge of financial matters is roughly the same as a four month old.


    Hey, dumbfuck, do you know what you do when people don’t want to borrow money from you? You raise the stakes, you promise them more in return for loaning you the money. Do you know what interest rates look like right this moment you dimwitted clod?


    Come back when you have something to say that isn’t discredited talking points.








  14. Lewis says:



    September 10th, 2010 at 7:45 pm

    At the risk of confirming Matt’s views, I think Prof Keen explains it well : http://www.debtdeflation.com/blogs/2010/09/05/back-to-the-future/








  15. Superior Excellence Better Flavor-Organic Kona Coffee | Toilet Safety Rail says:



    September 11th, 2010 at 5:50 am

    Matthew Yglesias » Mo’ Money, Mo’ Demand














Google New: It&#39;s Google <b>News</b> About New Google Stuff In One Place

In terms of blog networks, no one ever seems to talk about Google, but they actually have one of the biggest. The search giant has well over 100 blogs devoted to everything from general company news to niche things that only webmasters ...

ASEAN <b>News</b> Summary | Live Stock Trading <b>News</b> | Equities, Forex <b>...</b>

Get the best in ASEAN News daily at www.aseanaffairs.com ASEAN Affairs. PTT drops bid for Carrefour PTT Plc of Thailand is dropping its bid to purchase.

Olbermann On Sharron Angle Video | Fox <b>News</b> | Media Matters | Mediaite

You'll never believe this one, but it appears Keith Olbermann isn't the biggest fan of Fox News. But in case there was any doubt, on last night's Countdown he made it clear again, going after what he sees as the network blatantly ...


robert shumake

Google New: It&#39;s Google <b>News</b> About New Google Stuff In One Place

In terms of blog networks, no one ever seems to talk about Google, but they actually have one of the biggest. The search giant has well over 100 blogs devoted to everything from general company news to niche things that only webmasters ...

ASEAN <b>News</b> Summary | Live Stock Trading <b>News</b> | Equities, Forex <b>...</b>

Get the best in ASEAN News daily at www.aseanaffairs.com ASEAN Affairs. PTT drops bid for Carrefour PTT Plc of Thailand is dropping its bid to purchase.

Olbermann On Sharron Angle Video | Fox <b>News</b> | Media Matters | Mediaite

You'll never believe this one, but it appears Keith Olbermann isn't the biggest fan of Fox News. But in case there was any doubt, on last night's Countdown he made it clear again, going after what he sees as the network blatantly ...



"Flounder: You _______ up -- you trusted us."

-Otter in the movie Animal House.



Let's face it, we screwed up.



In the decade before 2008, the financial world was like a presidential inauguration ball.



On Inauguration day, there is a ball where only the closest insiders and Washington power players get invited.



There are also a lot of parties around town, so just about everybody in Washington feels like they were part of the event.



For a decade, Wall Street was playing funny money games. They were allowed to grant themselves multimillion dollar bonuses, and many Americans also felt like they were invited to the celebration.



Real estate prices were soaring. People were flipping houses and condos. People with lousy credit and no income were living in nice houses. Almost anyone could get a loan for anything.



Stock prices were going up and pension plans were getting fatter. State and local governments had a lot of money to throw around and could cut taxes without anyone really noticing.



We had easy money and reaped many benefits without hard work or sacrifice.



We were living in fantasy land.



The fantasy is over. We woke up to a nightmare.



A nightmare that our nation has not yet dealt with.



People with addictions go through a process called "bottoming out." They reach a point where they realize their actions are hurting themselves or others. They get help and dramatically change their lives.



Because of the Wall Street bailouts, America never got the chance to "bottom out."



Like a drunk who keeps "having a drink or two," America has not really dealt with the problems that got us in the mess.



Like an addict who keeps using, we are setting ourselves up for repeat failure.



I've been reading Maria Bartiromo's new book, The Weekend That Changed Wall Street. A better title might have been "The Weekend that Changed the World."



It was America's chance to bottom out. We didn't. To paraphrase Otter in Animal House, we screwed up. We mortgaged the future to make Wall Street happy today.



I liked Bartiromo's book. One of her insights jumped out at me.



In talking about the fall from grace that some Wall Street insiders felt, she noted "When the wealthy falter, there is a deep shame that the average person cannot grasp. In that world, you are either in or you're out."



That line explains everything. Wall Street was in. They had the right lobbyists and had an alumni association from Goldman Sachs, including Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson, doing their bidding in Washington.



Those who came from Wall Street looked out for their own. They made sure their Wall Street cronies were paid back, 100 cents on the dollar.



The rest of us were out. And we have stayed there.



Unemployment remains around 10% and underemployment is even more chronic. Sales of existing homes are at a 15-year low, despite some of the lowest mortgage rates in history. It's almost impossible for a Main Street business to get financing, and state and local government entities are looking at severe cuts in revenues and services.



We've spent trillions in bailout money and all we got was "one day older and deeper in debt."



Although it sounds gloomy, I'm not a gloomy person by nature. With focus, hard work and resilience, people can overcome any obstacle.



Including what Wall Street and Washington did to us.



People can solve problems by taking a hard look at themselves and making changes.



Washington is afraid to take that hard look or make real changes. Our political "leaders" won't do anything that cuts off the campaign contributions and lobbying money that Wall Street provides.



My next column will give a concrete plan for creating wealth without Wall Street. You can see signs of it. Concepts like Move Your Money are catching on. People are starting to pay down debt and look at creating their own businesses.



We weren't really invited to the big Wall Street party. But we sure wound up paying for it.



Now it is time to recover from the hangover.







Don McNay, CLU, ChFC, MSFS, CSSC of Richmond Kentucky is an award-winning financial columnist and Huffington Post Contributor.



You can read more about Don at www.donmcnay.com



McNay founded McNay Settlement Group, a structured settlement and consulting firm, in 1983, and Kentucky Guardianship Administrators LLC in 2000. You can read more about both at www.mcnay.com



McNay has Master's Degrees from Vanderbilt and the American College and is in the Hall of Distinguished Alumni of Eastern Kentucky University.



McNay has written two books. Most recent is Son of a Son of a Gambler: Winners, Losers and What to Do When You Win The Lottery



McNay is a lifetime member of the Million Dollar Round Table and has four professional designations in the financial services field.




















15 Responses to “Mo’ Money, Mo’ Demand”






  1. SON says:



    September 9th, 2010 at 4:04 pm

    DAD I AM HOMOSEX.








  2. DAD says:



    September 9th, 2010 at 4:04 pm

    SON I AM DISAPPOINT.








  3. Rob Mac says:



    September 9th, 2010 at 4:53 pm

    Or we could simply “print” money to retire some of our debt. This would reassure people who get freaked out at the size of the debt and would have the same inflationary effect of handing the money out to American citizens. The stimulative effect would likely be a bit less, but I’d take that tradeoff.








  4. JR says:



    September 9th, 2010 at 4:54 pm

    Aren’t you missing the role of international trade. What you say makes sense if all goods and services are produced locally. Once you take intl. trade into account, more/printed money could simply go into buying more from other countries, who could theoretically hold that money for an indefinite time.








  5. chris says:



    September 9th, 2010 at 4:56 pm

    It’s true that at some point the money-printing would spark high inflation.


    Yes — specifically, after aggregate demand was boosted to the point that it exceeded aggregate supply. We’re nowhere near that point — I think literally trillions of dollars short of it — so there’s plenty of room to play around with helicopter drops. Please do, Mr. Bernanke.








  6. timmie says:



    September 9th, 2010 at 4:59 pm

    Did that truly huge spike in Fed spending 2008-2009 lead to rapid economic growth? No. What evidence is there that things would be any different now? None.

    The Great Reckoning that we are now experiencing was, as your cite points out, only postponed through half a decade of public and private debt increasing by 10% a year and when that became unsustainable our financial system cratered.

    Does anyone think we can return to those levels of profligacy for five years or more? Does anyone doubt that even that level of new debt would prove inadequate to cure what ails us?

    Our recent history has been one huge Keynesian experiment gone wrong. But to put out the fire in the dining room Matt wants to burn down the house.








  7. chris says:



    September 9th, 2010 at 5:29 pm

    Did that truly huge spike in Fed spending 2008-2009 lead to rapid economic growth? No.


    No, it only halted a once-in-a-century level of economic collapse in its tracks.


    But I guess since the first gallon of water didn’t put the fire out, it’s time to abandon that plan and switch to gasoline.








  8. Ape Man says:



    September 9th, 2010 at 8:32 pm

    “Or we could simply “print” money to retire some of our debt.”


    This is incorrect. If you think it through, it will help you understand how money works on the macro scale.


    A treasury note is an account at the Fed that bears interest. It has a fixed, often very short, term of maturity.


    If you “print money” to “retire” that debt, all you are doing is changing those interest-bearing Fed accounts into non interest-bearing Fed accounts. The people who held those dollars want to hold them as Treasury notes. They will immediately reinvest them in… Treasury notes.


    3








  9. zyxw says:



    September 9th, 2010 at 8:50 pm

    Another structural problem now is income inequality. If income was spread out more fairly there would be a lot more money spent generating more jobs, etc. There’s only so much the super rich can spend–after awhile you really can’t buy that much more stuff, so instead they are hoarding it at the moment waiting for the economy to rebound so they can eventually invest in something and make even more money to hoard.








  10. Shooter242 says:



    September 9th, 2010 at 10:33 pm

    * You can print all the money you want but if people don’t want to borrow, it doesn’t matter.

    * As for throwing everybody a grand, it didn’t work with Bush’s $600 because you and everyone else knows it’s a one-off.

    * Then there is the payroll credit for about the same amount of money, how did that work out?


    Do you think our problem could be related to Congress serving up legislative pigs in a poke? For all it’s wonderfulness, health insurance in Massachusetts has led to Mass Gen Hospital

    to barring new primary care patients. Now imagine that over an entire country. Any chance that would lead to more saving and less spending?


    As for income inequality, Al Gore making millions has no effect on anyone that he doesn’t employ. Interestingly, the US is pretty far down on the property rights ladder globally. Apparently we are behind China, Gambia, and Jordan. Having yahoos here threaten to confiscate wealth by hook or crook, isn’t reassuring.








  11. BB says:



    September 9th, 2010 at 11:23 pm

    So, why do we even keep track of the deficit? I accept the fact that we have a sovereign currency, not on a gold standard, etc., which means that we don’t have to go in debt (i.e. sell bonds) for every dollar we print/create. Thus taxation is merely an anti-inflationary measure. So…shouldn’t we just keep track of inflation and adjust our federal spending accordingly, since the deficit doesn’t actually mean anything?








  12. urgs says:



    September 10th, 2010 at 2:23 am

    Defraud small savers (thats allright, since so many of them are foreigners nowadays – evil Chinese, many of them living from less than 1$ a day), shovel some windfall gains to big business ===> ?????????? =====> Jobs!


    aelkejeellekeleljklejlelje








  13. Evil Twin says:



    September 10th, 2010 at 2:35 am

    You can print all the money you want but if people don’t want to borrow, it doesn’t matter.


    And here we see the return of the invisible bear riding phantom bond vigilantes. Yes, the modifiers are a bit unclear. That’s because Shooter is a fucking moron whose knowledge of financial matters is roughly the same as a four month old.


    Hey, dumbfuck, do you know what you do when people don’t want to borrow money from you? You raise the stakes, you promise them more in return for loaning you the money. Do you know what interest rates look like right this moment you dimwitted clod?


    Come back when you have something to say that isn’t discredited talking points.








  14. Lewis says:



    September 10th, 2010 at 7:45 pm

    At the risk of confirming Matt’s views, I think Prof Keen explains it well : http://www.debtdeflation.com/blogs/2010/09/05/back-to-the-future/








  15. Superior Excellence Better Flavor-Organic Kona Coffee | Toilet Safety Rail says:



    September 11th, 2010 at 5:50 am

    Matthew Yglesias » Mo’ Money, Mo’ Demand















PRO FOREX ROBOT by Sleaford Standard Your Photos


robert shumake

Google New: It&#39;s Google <b>News</b> About New Google Stuff In One Place

In terms of blog networks, no one ever seems to talk about Google, but they actually have one of the biggest. The search giant has well over 100 blogs devoted to everything from general company news to niche things that only webmasters ...

ASEAN <b>News</b> Summary | Live Stock Trading <b>News</b> | Equities, Forex <b>...</b>

Get the best in ASEAN News daily at www.aseanaffairs.com ASEAN Affairs. PTT drops bid for Carrefour PTT Plc of Thailand is dropping its bid to purchase.

Olbermann On Sharron Angle Video | Fox <b>News</b> | Media Matters | Mediaite

You'll never believe this one, but it appears Keith Olbermann isn't the biggest fan of Fox News. But in case there was any doubt, on last night's Countdown he made it clear again, going after what he sees as the network blatantly ...


robert shumake

Google New: It&#39;s Google <b>News</b> About New Google Stuff In One Place

In terms of blog networks, no one ever seems to talk about Google, but they actually have one of the biggest. The search giant has well over 100 blogs devoted to everything from general company news to niche things that only webmasters ...

ASEAN <b>News</b> Summary | Live Stock Trading <b>News</b> | Equities, Forex <b>...</b>

Get the best in ASEAN News daily at www.aseanaffairs.com ASEAN Affairs. PTT drops bid for Carrefour PTT Plc of Thailand is dropping its bid to purchase.

Olbermann On Sharron Angle Video | Fox <b>News</b> | Media Matters | Mediaite

You'll never believe this one, but it appears Keith Olbermann isn't the biggest fan of Fox News. But in case there was any doubt, on last night's Countdown he made it clear again, going after what he sees as the network blatantly ...

















Wednesday, September 22, 2010

Making Money on Internet


Symantec this morning released two new security software products, Norton AntiVirus 2011 and Norton Internet Security 2011.


Coinciding with the release, the company has also published its latest cybercrime report, dubbed The Norton Cybercrime Report: The Human Impact. The company claims two-thirds (65 percent) of global Internet users have already fallen victim to cybercrimes, which includes computer viruses, online credit card fraud and identity theft.


I’ll say it right off the bat: Symantec just so happens to sell security software, and they have new products to promote, so it’s in their best interest to scare people into awareness and try and push them into purchasing mode. Take any research findings from commercial companies with a big grain of salt, always.


That said, cybercrime is prevalent, there’s no question about that. I can imagine the 65 percent of global Internet users is likely close to the truth, and suspect that percentage to increase for the foreseeable future.


Zooming in on nations, Symantec claims almost three-quarters (73 percent) of U.S. Web surfers have fallen victim to cybercrimes, ranking it third according to Symantec (fourth according to myself), behind China (83 percent) and Brazil and India (both 76 percent).


The company also surveyed 7,000 Web users in order to assess the emotional impact of cybercrime. The study shows that victims’ strongest reactions are feeling angry (58 percent), annoyed (51 percent) and cheated (40 percent), and in many cases, they blame themselves for being attacked.


Only 3 percent don’t think it will happen to them, and nearly 80 percent do not expect cybercriminals to be brought to justice, which Symantec says ironically results in a reluctance to take action and a sense of helplessness.


Only half (51 percent) of adults saying they would change their behavior if they became a victim. Fewer than half (44 percent) reported the crime to the police.


Also, nearly half of respondents assume it’s legal to download a content such as music and movies without paying, which Symantec posits opens people up to a range of security threats.


Again, Symantec wants you to buy Norton products, but it’d be foolish to dismiss that cybercrime is a genuine security threat, and a growing one at that. Buy (or use any free) security software you wish if you haven’t already done so, and make sure to update it regularly – it’s worth the money and hassle. And if you do get hit with a virus or malware, or fall victim to identity theft, sexual predation or credit card fraud, report it to the authorities.


There’s no way cybercrimes are going to be stopped any time soon, but we should at least try and stop making it easier for scammers by not taking action.



The fight over net neutrality is red hot right now. Since news broke that Google and Verizon were hatching a plan to carve up the Internet, millions have woken up to the fact that the Internet is in jeopardy and the would-be watchdogs at the Federal Communications Commission aren't doing much about it.



Those of us who've been in the trenches the past few years defending the free and open Internet from a corporate takeover understand that -- like in any high-stakes political debate -- things can get a little ugly. When you're challenging the interests of giant corporations like AT&T, Comcast and Verizon, you have to expect they're going to spread misinformation, call you names, hire astroturf front groups to attack you, and spend gobs and gobs of money to co-opt Congress and confuse the public. That's politics.



You can't outspend these corporate behemoths; they've got hundreds of high-priced lobbyists roaming Capitol Hill. But there are two ways to fight back: with facts and with fire. The first means debunking myths and rebutting industry claims with hard data and substantive analysis. The second means coming up with compelling arguments and creative tactics to draw the attention of the 99.9% of Americans who aren't paid to read thousands of pages of detailed, technical comments filed in the FCC docket.



Now the fire is starting to spread. In just the past few weeks, hundreds of thousands of people have blasted Google-Verizon for getting in bed together. A bunch even showed up outside Google headquarters one Friday holding signs and chanting "don't be evil." On the blogs (if not the nightly news, alas) net neutrality was a bigger story than the "ground zero mosque."



This is a big moment. If we're ever going to safeguard the open Internet, the time is now. But all of this noise and attention is making certain people very uncomfortable.



You know the type: I call them the guardians of the mythical mushy middle. And I'm starting to think these self-righteous, can't-we-all-just-get-along zealots of moderation are more dangerous to the prospects of net neutrality than the greedy industry CEOs, their hired guns, or even Glenn Beck.



To the Extreme!



These sentinels of the sacred center aren't that concerned about the substance of any given debate, as long as the debaters don't offend their delicate sensibilities. They specialize in a brand of lazy conventional wisdom that's long been a staple of inside-the-Beltway political pontificating (see Broder, David). They are the school librarians of our political discourse: No matter the stakes or the truth, they're just more comfortable if everyone -- especially you riff-raff out there called the public -- would just keep it down.



Now they're turning their attention to net neutrality. Like the coverage of any hot-button political issue, their formula is simple and doesn't require much research: The answer to just about any policy question can be found by simply striking a balance between two "extremes." The middle is inherently good and always right. If you disagree, then you're probably an extremist. And then who cares what you think.



Take the example of Washington Post business columnist Steven Pearlstein. When he weighed in on the net neutrality hullabaloo two weeks ago, he did criticize the industry. But he reserved his most biting disdain for net neutrality supporters, dismissing them as "ayatollahs" and "crusaders" engaged in "religious warfare." After all, they were thwarting the FCC chairman's effort to "broker a consensus" -- a consensus being the Holy Grail for mushy middlers, even better than a compromise.



Since then, "extreme" has become the pejorative of choice for critics of the net neutrality debate, though it's almost always reserved for public interest advocates and not the big corporations that actually are trying to defang the FCC and trash the foundations of U.S. communications policy.



Shhh ... Moderates at Work



Especially worrisome to the mushy middle is that the "extreme rhetoric" around net neutrality could "run amok."



That's another hallmark of the middlers: being far more concerned with the tone of the debate than its outcome.



For example, Lauren Weinstein, who moderates a listserv about net neutrality and fashions himself a moderate in the debate, got much more worked up about the "rude" and "over the top" reactions to the Google-Verizon pact (especially that protest in Mountain View) than the ramifications of the disingenuous deal. "I am disappointed," he wrote on his blog, "no, that's not a strong enough word -- I'm mortified -- by the level of vitriol, obnoxiousness, obscenity, and emotionally-laden, hyperbole-saturated rhetoric that is characterizing many of the negative responses to the proposal."



Weinstein, of course, ignores that the overwhelming public outcry against the Google-Verizon pact is what put net neutrality back on the front pages and - perhaps more importantly - The Daily Show for the first time since the late Ted Stevens started ranting back in the day about "a series of tubes." People are paying attention, and it's not because of an outbreak of civility.



I love parsing the nuances of "paid prioritization" more than the next guy. But we'd have lost the open Internet long ago if activists hadn't sounded the alarm and taken to the streets. Without them, there would be no public debate about Net Neutrality. And if you want to get things done in Washington, you have to come ready for a bare-knuckle brawl -- not a pillow fight.



Weinstein did get up off his fainting couch long enough to praise Google and Verizon for the "willingness of both firms to put forth their public proposal," as if they were just spit-balling some ideas for the public to ponder rather than lobbing a grenade in a heated political battle. But pretending you're above politics is yet another staple of the mushy middle.



The FCC Muddles Toward the Middle



Unfortunately, the mushy middle is also a staple of politics, as embodied by FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski. A year ago, Genachowski promised to fulfill President Obama's pledge to take "a back seat to no one" on net neutrality. But instead of getting in the driver's seat, it's more like he's been trying to hide in the trunk. Most notably, he's failed to move to restore his agency's authority over broadband, which was thrown into question after a federal court decision last spring and is a prerequisite to making any new rules.



He did launch a net neutrality rulemaking process, in which he's solicited public comment again and again and again -- but taken no action. He's asked a lot of questions but provided no answers. And he's had trouble finding a steady perch in the center. When industry lobbyists swarm his office, he starts leaning their way. When the public protests, he retreats. The irony is that that swing vote he needs for a majority is his own.



Instead, he continues to wander on an elusive search for consensus. Genachowski promised an open process, then tried to cut a closed-door deal with the biggest companies. That ended when Google and Verizon went public. Now after being silent for weeks, he finally responded to the Google-Verizon pact with - you guessed it - more questions and another comment cycle that could push a final decision until December ... maybe.



The fundamental problem with the mythical middle ground is that it doesn't exist; the search is futile. But that doesn't mean you can't go on searching for it forever.



Unfortunately, Internet users don't have forever; they're left unprotected right now. And the more deals the big companies can lock in now, the harder it will be to hold on to the free and open Internet as we know it.



Net Neutrality: Yes or No



You see, when it comes to net neutrality -- there's yes or no, right or wrong. It's like binary code, ones and zeros. You're either for net neutrality, or you're against it. (Or, in the case of Google, you're for it before you were against it.)



Either you think Net Neutrality should apply no matter how you access the Internet, or you're Googizon and say wireless networks don't count. You either expand the open Internet for everyone and continue building an amazing resource for free speech and innovation, or you invest in private toll lanes for the select few. You either believe the FCC should have the power to protect Internet users, or you want a toothless watchdog. You have to choose.



What's missing at the FCC seems to be guiding set of values through which they make the difficult choices base on what the best policy is - not how much political cover they can get. Then they need to go out into the world and speak plainly about what the government needs to do and why they are doing it.



What the public wants and the Internet desperately needs isn't another compromise but a leader willing to make tough decisions. We need someone less concerned about which way the political winds are blowing today and more concerned about his legacy.



If you always try to split the baby, you end up with a lot of dead babies.



OK, maybe that was a little too extreme. But you know what I mean.







Facebook claims 200 million gamers <b>News</b> - Page 1 | Eurogamer.net

Read our news of Facebook claims 200 million gamers.

Google New: It&#39;s Google <b>News</b> About New Google Stuff In One Place

In terms of blog networks, no one ever seems to talk about Google, but they actually have one of the biggest. The search giant has well over 100 blogs devoted to everything from general company news to niche things that only webmasters ...

Small Business <b>News</b>: ROI Realities

To understand how to run a small business is to understand ROI. That is, we must understand how to bring a return on investment for every decision we make when.


robert shumake

Facebook claims 200 million gamers <b>News</b> - Page 1 | Eurogamer.net

Read our news of Facebook claims 200 million gamers.

Google New: It&#39;s Google <b>News</b> About New Google Stuff In One Place

In terms of blog networks, no one ever seems to talk about Google, but they actually have one of the biggest. The search giant has well over 100 blogs devoted to everything from general company news to niche things that only webmasters ...

Small Business <b>News</b>: ROI Realities

To understand how to run a small business is to understand ROI. That is, we must understand how to bring a return on investment for every decision we make when.



Symantec this morning released two new security software products, Norton AntiVirus 2011 and Norton Internet Security 2011.


Coinciding with the release, the company has also published its latest cybercrime report, dubbed The Norton Cybercrime Report: The Human Impact. The company claims two-thirds (65 percent) of global Internet users have already fallen victim to cybercrimes, which includes computer viruses, online credit card fraud and identity theft.


I’ll say it right off the bat: Symantec just so happens to sell security software, and they have new products to promote, so it’s in their best interest to scare people into awareness and try and push them into purchasing mode. Take any research findings from commercial companies with a big grain of salt, always.


That said, cybercrime is prevalent, there’s no question about that. I can imagine the 65 percent of global Internet users is likely close to the truth, and suspect that percentage to increase for the foreseeable future.


Zooming in on nations, Symantec claims almost three-quarters (73 percent) of U.S. Web surfers have fallen victim to cybercrimes, ranking it third according to Symantec (fourth according to myself), behind China (83 percent) and Brazil and India (both 76 percent).


The company also surveyed 7,000 Web users in order to assess the emotional impact of cybercrime. The study shows that victims’ strongest reactions are feeling angry (58 percent), annoyed (51 percent) and cheated (40 percent), and in many cases, they blame themselves for being attacked.


Only 3 percent don’t think it will happen to them, and nearly 80 percent do not expect cybercriminals to be brought to justice, which Symantec says ironically results in a reluctance to take action and a sense of helplessness.


Only half (51 percent) of adults saying they would change their behavior if they became a victim. Fewer than half (44 percent) reported the crime to the police.


Also, nearly half of respondents assume it’s legal to download a content such as music and movies without paying, which Symantec posits opens people up to a range of security threats.


Again, Symantec wants you to buy Norton products, but it’d be foolish to dismiss that cybercrime is a genuine security threat, and a growing one at that. Buy (or use any free) security software you wish if you haven’t already done so, and make sure to update it regularly – it’s worth the money and hassle. And if you do get hit with a virus or malware, or fall victim to identity theft, sexual predation or credit card fraud, report it to the authorities.


There’s no way cybercrimes are going to be stopped any time soon, but we should at least try and stop making it easier for scammers by not taking action.



The fight over net neutrality is red hot right now. Since news broke that Google and Verizon were hatching a plan to carve up the Internet, millions have woken up to the fact that the Internet is in jeopardy and the would-be watchdogs at the Federal Communications Commission aren't doing much about it.



Those of us who've been in the trenches the past few years defending the free and open Internet from a corporate takeover understand that -- like in any high-stakes political debate -- things can get a little ugly. When you're challenging the interests of giant corporations like AT&T, Comcast and Verizon, you have to expect they're going to spread misinformation, call you names, hire astroturf front groups to attack you, and spend gobs and gobs of money to co-opt Congress and confuse the public. That's politics.



You can't outspend these corporate behemoths; they've got hundreds of high-priced lobbyists roaming Capitol Hill. But there are two ways to fight back: with facts and with fire. The first means debunking myths and rebutting industry claims with hard data and substantive analysis. The second means coming up with compelling arguments and creative tactics to draw the attention of the 99.9% of Americans who aren't paid to read thousands of pages of detailed, technical comments filed in the FCC docket.



Now the fire is starting to spread. In just the past few weeks, hundreds of thousands of people have blasted Google-Verizon for getting in bed together. A bunch even showed up outside Google headquarters one Friday holding signs and chanting "don't be evil." On the blogs (if not the nightly news, alas) net neutrality was a bigger story than the "ground zero mosque."



This is a big moment. If we're ever going to safeguard the open Internet, the time is now. But all of this noise and attention is making certain people very uncomfortable.



You know the type: I call them the guardians of the mythical mushy middle. And I'm starting to think these self-righteous, can't-we-all-just-get-along zealots of moderation are more dangerous to the prospects of net neutrality than the greedy industry CEOs, their hired guns, or even Glenn Beck.



To the Extreme!



These sentinels of the sacred center aren't that concerned about the substance of any given debate, as long as the debaters don't offend their delicate sensibilities. They specialize in a brand of lazy conventional wisdom that's long been a staple of inside-the-Beltway political pontificating (see Broder, David). They are the school librarians of our political discourse: No matter the stakes or the truth, they're just more comfortable if everyone -- especially you riff-raff out there called the public -- would just keep it down.



Now they're turning their attention to net neutrality. Like the coverage of any hot-button political issue, their formula is simple and doesn't require much research: The answer to just about any policy question can be found by simply striking a balance between two "extremes." The middle is inherently good and always right. If you disagree, then you're probably an extremist. And then who cares what you think.



Take the example of Washington Post business columnist Steven Pearlstein. When he weighed in on the net neutrality hullabaloo two weeks ago, he did criticize the industry. But he reserved his most biting disdain for net neutrality supporters, dismissing them as "ayatollahs" and "crusaders" engaged in "religious warfare." After all, they were thwarting the FCC chairman's effort to "broker a consensus" -- a consensus being the Holy Grail for mushy middlers, even better than a compromise.



Since then, "extreme" has become the pejorative of choice for critics of the net neutrality debate, though it's almost always reserved for public interest advocates and not the big corporations that actually are trying to defang the FCC and trash the foundations of U.S. communications policy.



Shhh ... Moderates at Work



Especially worrisome to the mushy middle is that the "extreme rhetoric" around net neutrality could "run amok."



That's another hallmark of the middlers: being far more concerned with the tone of the debate than its outcome.



For example, Lauren Weinstein, who moderates a listserv about net neutrality and fashions himself a moderate in the debate, got much more worked up about the "rude" and "over the top" reactions to the Google-Verizon pact (especially that protest in Mountain View) than the ramifications of the disingenuous deal. "I am disappointed," he wrote on his blog, "no, that's not a strong enough word -- I'm mortified -- by the level of vitriol, obnoxiousness, obscenity, and emotionally-laden, hyperbole-saturated rhetoric that is characterizing many of the negative responses to the proposal."



Weinstein, of course, ignores that the overwhelming public outcry against the Google-Verizon pact is what put net neutrality back on the front pages and - perhaps more importantly - The Daily Show for the first time since the late Ted Stevens started ranting back in the day about "a series of tubes." People are paying attention, and it's not because of an outbreak of civility.



I love parsing the nuances of "paid prioritization" more than the next guy. But we'd have lost the open Internet long ago if activists hadn't sounded the alarm and taken to the streets. Without them, there would be no public debate about Net Neutrality. And if you want to get things done in Washington, you have to come ready for a bare-knuckle brawl -- not a pillow fight.



Weinstein did get up off his fainting couch long enough to praise Google and Verizon for the "willingness of both firms to put forth their public proposal," as if they were just spit-balling some ideas for the public to ponder rather than lobbing a grenade in a heated political battle. But pretending you're above politics is yet another staple of the mushy middle.



The FCC Muddles Toward the Middle



Unfortunately, the mushy middle is also a staple of politics, as embodied by FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski. A year ago, Genachowski promised to fulfill President Obama's pledge to take "a back seat to no one" on net neutrality. But instead of getting in the driver's seat, it's more like he's been trying to hide in the trunk. Most notably, he's failed to move to restore his agency's authority over broadband, which was thrown into question after a federal court decision last spring and is a prerequisite to making any new rules.



He did launch a net neutrality rulemaking process, in which he's solicited public comment again and again and again -- but taken no action. He's asked a lot of questions but provided no answers. And he's had trouble finding a steady perch in the center. When industry lobbyists swarm his office, he starts leaning their way. When the public protests, he retreats. The irony is that that swing vote he needs for a majority is his own.



Instead, he continues to wander on an elusive search for consensus. Genachowski promised an open process, then tried to cut a closed-door deal with the biggest companies. That ended when Google and Verizon went public. Now after being silent for weeks, he finally responded to the Google-Verizon pact with - you guessed it - more questions and another comment cycle that could push a final decision until December ... maybe.



The fundamental problem with the mythical middle ground is that it doesn't exist; the search is futile. But that doesn't mean you can't go on searching for it forever.



Unfortunately, Internet users don't have forever; they're left unprotected right now. And the more deals the big companies can lock in now, the harder it will be to hold on to the free and open Internet as we know it.



Net Neutrality: Yes or No



You see, when it comes to net neutrality -- there's yes or no, right or wrong. It's like binary code, ones and zeros. You're either for net neutrality, or you're against it. (Or, in the case of Google, you're for it before you were against it.)



Either you think Net Neutrality should apply no matter how you access the Internet, or you're Googizon and say wireless networks don't count. You either expand the open Internet for everyone and continue building an amazing resource for free speech and innovation, or you invest in private toll lanes for the select few. You either believe the FCC should have the power to protect Internet users, or you want a toothless watchdog. You have to choose.



What's missing at the FCC seems to be guiding set of values through which they make the difficult choices base on what the best policy is - not how much political cover they can get. Then they need to go out into the world and speak plainly about what the government needs to do and why they are doing it.



What the public wants and the Internet desperately needs isn't another compromise but a leader willing to make tough decisions. We need someone less concerned about which way the political winds are blowing today and more concerned about his legacy.



If you always try to split the baby, you end up with a lot of dead babies.



OK, maybe that was a little too extreme. But you know what I mean.








”The All American Business Shirt” - front by maurice flower


robert shumake

Facebook claims 200 million gamers <b>News</b> - Page 1 | Eurogamer.net

Read our news of Facebook claims 200 million gamers.

Google New: It&#39;s Google <b>News</b> About New Google Stuff In One Place

In terms of blog networks, no one ever seems to talk about Google, but they actually have one of the biggest. The search giant has well over 100 blogs devoted to everything from general company news to niche things that only webmasters ...

Small Business <b>News</b>: ROI Realities

To understand how to run a small business is to understand ROI. That is, we must understand how to bring a return on investment for every decision we make when.


robert shumake

Facebook claims 200 million gamers <b>News</b> - Page 1 | Eurogamer.net

Read our news of Facebook claims 200 million gamers.

Google New: It&#39;s Google <b>News</b> About New Google Stuff In One Place

In terms of blog networks, no one ever seems to talk about Google, but they actually have one of the biggest. The search giant has well over 100 blogs devoted to everything from general company news to niche things that only webmasters ...

Small Business <b>News</b>: ROI Realities

To understand how to run a small business is to understand ROI. That is, we must understand how to bring a return on investment for every decision we make when.